There was a highly significant increase in pH in the TS group (mean pH 6.24 in the RIFA nest compared to 4.72 in the control group ( p < 0.001)).
Excerpts
Bengal cats, however, showed a highly significant deviation in their paw preference from that expected by chance alone (χ2[df = 2, n = 12] = 14.00, p < 0.001), with animals leaning more towards left- than right-pawedness or ambilaterality.
This is confirmed by the One way ANOVA test carried out taking into account the three sites of recovery of the animals which was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Table 2 ). 4.
Positive impacts were also seen when including OTM in basal diets, but a far greater number of highly significant ( p < 0.001) results were found in studies when total replacement of ITM with OTM occurred.
The results showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences, with a distance of 582 m covered per 24 h on average at the beginning, 391 m in the middle and 261 m at the end of the fattening period.
Complex S*E Model for Ethiopian Regions The complex model (2) with strain, environment, sex, and all their two-way and three-way interactions showed highly significant S*E effects ( p < 0.001; bold in Table 6 ) when using the Ethiopian region as the environment.
Using a dependent (paired) t -test, highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were found in most of the feed ingredients but not DDGS.
The highly significant ( p < 0.001) F IS value (0.0923) revealed a rather high inbreeding degree within populations.
Linear regression of log V on log M was highly significant (MS regression 941.215, MS residual 0.633, F 1,323 = 1486.04, p < 0.001), with estimated coefficients a = 0.781 (95% confidence intervals 0.609–0.952) and b = 1.683 (1.597–1.769).
The HMR model for intentions to sterilise semi-owned dogs in the future was highly significant F(9, 48) = 11.45, p < 0.001.
A strong and highly significant positive correlation was identified between handler substitution (Handler) and both serum cortisol levels (r s = 0.67, p = 0.001) and respiratory rate (r s = 0.66, p = 0.001), linking personnel rotation to heightened physiological stress.
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, where 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1 indicates a significant trend, and p < 0.001 indicates a highly significant difference. 3.
Based on the highly significant difference in the coverage index ( p = 0.001), group H had a higher OTU richness than group D.
Specifically, four nutrients (DM, CP, NDF, ADF) demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with β-GC and EG (r > 0.82, p < 0.001) and a significant correlation with CBH (r > 0.50, p < 0.05).
All pair-wise distances were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The one-way ANOVA model confirmed highly significant between-group variation (F = 28.7, p < 0.001), with the transitional phase accounting for 63% of the total variance.
Hence, SP-7, with a pH of 7.2 ± 0.1, had a trend for higher values than CON-0 ( p = 0.07), CIDR-7 ( p < 0.05) and CIDR-14 ( p = 0.05), while the differences were highly significant when assessing the SP-14 group, with a pH of 8.0 ± 0.2, against SP-7 ( p < 0.001) and CON-0, CIDR-7 and CIDR-14 ( p < 0.00001 for all).
A highly significant difference in birth weight between the Landrace and Yorkshire breeds was observed ( p < 0.001, Table 2 and Figure 1 a), reflecting breed-specific variations that may be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors.
There was a highly significant difference between collections in the proportion of feeding behaviour by callimico (ANOVA F (4,25) = 10.99, p < 0.001).
Crucially, the Condition × Time interaction was highly significant ( F = 19.024; p < 0.001), showing that the temporal change differed between the two groups.
Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.001.
The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no differences between farms in the distribution of fresh injuries, but highly significant differences in the distribution of scars per animal ( p < 0.001).
Chi-square test showed a highly significant association between ABCD4 genotype distribution and vertebral phenotypes (overall χ 2 = 76.86, df = 6, p < 0.001; Table 3 ).
Subsequent MANOVA performed on this dataset revealed that our discriminant analysis was highly significant (Wilks Lambda = 0.017; F (2,32) = 66.3; p < 0.001).
Average milk yields were 4.7 and 7.4 kg cow −1 day −1 and this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.2.