Regression 1 was quite significant ( F = 60.61, p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.045).
Excerpts
Results The differences between the four conditions were highly significant [ F (3,45) = 9.48, p < 0.01] by a repeated measures, one-way ANOVA applied to the scores of the 16 participants.
Furthermore, the preliminary bivariate correlation analysis, among participants who attended the post-training PPEt session, showed positive, highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) linear relationships among all eight variables related to the SMC.
The correlations between each of the 70 items and the overall scores of the SMPS-PPE were highly significant ( p < 0.01, see Table 5 for details), with correlation coefficients greater than 0.40.
The analyses between the studied variables yielded highly significant correlation coefficients ( p < 0.01).
First, although the practice effect is highly significant ( p < 0.01), in practical terms it is rather small (some 40 ms difference in RT and 2% difference in PC).
Table 6 shows the regression results where the F values in all the models are highly significant ( p < 0.01).
In contrast, a weak yet highly significant positive association was found between family size and adolescents' weekend day television entertainment (ρ = 0.098, p < 0.01), with a small effect size (η 2 = 0.009).
For the Brazilian sample, LAP (β = −0.20, p = 0.05) had a marginally significant influence and HAP (β = −0.40, p < 0.01) had a large influence.
The test–retest reliability coefficient in ranged from 0.83 to 0.87 in the Canadian sample and 0.72 to 0.89 in the American sample, and all coefficients were highly significant ( p < 0.01; LaFreniere and Dumas, 2003 ).
Results indicate that ATT is only affected when a highly significant unobserved factor exists, doubling the likelihood of teacher participation in professional development ( p < 0.01).
Results The total motor health scores of the preschoolers showed highly significant positive correlations ( p -value < 0.01) at the 0.01 level (two-tailed) with motor ability, physical health, mental health, social and emotional competence, motor health environment, and motor health behavior.
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.01; see Table 4 ).
Notably, the scale showed moderate and highly significant correlations with both Anxious Attachment (r = 0.46, p < 0.01) and Avoidant Attachment (r = 0.47, p < 0.01), indicating that disorganized attachment encompasses aspects of both anxiety and avoidance in attachment behaviors.
Results The results revealed a highly significant difference between the levels of trauma experience that induced PTSD and the frequency of IMEs ( p < 0.01).
As can be seen from Table 4 Model 3, the negative emotional polarity of online reviews under both factors has an extremely significant negative impact on consumer purchase decisions (α 7 = −10.017, p < 0.01; α 8 = −0.659, p < 0.01).
A highly significant main effect of disciplinary intensity was observed, F (2, 541) = 4,047.23, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.88, reflecting a large effect size.
Self-confidence remained marginally significant ( β = 0.11, p = 0.01), suggesting a slight reduction in its effect after introducing motivational factors.
Simple slope analysis showed that when the grit level was low ( M -1 SD ), the psychological security followed a decreasing trend with the increase of interpersonal stress score (simple slope = −0.48, t = −12.33, p < 0.01).
It shows that the results are highly consistent with baseline findings, with all regression coefficients being highly significant and positive ( p < 0.01).
The main effect of frame was also highly significant, F (1, 156) = 8.0, p < 0.01.
Commitment indicated positive and highly significant relationship with employee resilience ( r = 0.515, p < 0.01).
In the overall sample, both boys and girls show statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the majority of motor performance items.
On the other hand, positive and highly significant correlations were found between Digital minimalism and Stress ( r = 0.906, p < 0.01) and Depression ( r = 0.843, p < 0.01).
The Model ANOVA results showed that the model is highly significant ( F = 45.00, p < 0.01), providing evidence for the overall predictive power of the model.