Days to 50% flowering Days to flowering was very highly significantly (P < 0.001) and highly significant (P < 0.01) influenced by the main effect of variety and tuber size, respectively.
Excerpts
There was a highly significant and negative effect of the ring width logarithm on Ca ( p < 0.001, ***, Fig. 4 d) and wider rings had lower Ca concentrations.
**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 were considered highly significant). 3.
The depths avowed more highly significant (p < 0.001) SOC stocks in topsoils (0–30 cm depth) than that of the subsoils (30–60 cm depth) in the two cropping systems.
The pairwise comparison for “coronal”/“middle” showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for “coronal”/“apical” and “middle”/“apical” showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001).
• ∗ indicates p < 0.05 (significant) • ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01 (highly significant) • ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 (very highly significant) • ∗∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.0001 (extremely highly significant) • ns indicates p ≥ 0.05 (not significant) For the p-value test, a smaller value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting a more significant difference between the methods.
Combining ability and gene action Parents and hybrids were observed to have highly significant (p < 0.001) GCA and SCA effects, in direct as well as reciprocal crosses, for TSW and OC ( Table 2 ).
This mutation exhibited an unfavorable trend in terms of survival (HR 7.775; P < 0.001), indicating a potentially detrimental effect on patient outcomes [ 190 ].
All regression analyses were highly significant ( p ≤ 001).
The heterogeneity accounting for the differences in effect sizes among the studies included in the meta-analysis was large and highly significant (Q (51) = 179.742, p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the Firmicute to Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B) was highly significant decreased ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 4 B).
Leaf area [ cm 2 ] : The interactions of Azolla and nitrogen fertilizer on leaf area were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) ( Table 1 S).
The grain yield was found to be highly significant (P < 0.001) when analyzed against N levels in both seasons of the BBF and camber bed experiments.
Although significance levels were taken at p < 0.05, it was also stated when specific terms were found more significant (p < 0.01), highly significant (p < 0.001) or borderline (0.05 < p < 0.15).
Subjective fatigue measured before, during and after flights using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale was highly significant (p < 0.001) increased over the duration of the flight [ 16 ].
The difference was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating the success of the HSRCLP intervention in enhancing research attitudes among average and low-performing students. 4 Discussion The current study's findings provide significant insights into the effectiveness of the High School Research Cognitive Learning Program (HSRCLP) in enhancing research attitudes among high school students.
Effect on serum creatinine, urea, uric acid and albumin Positive control (only lead acetate treated) group showed highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in serum creatinine, urea, uric acid and extremely significant (P < 0.001) reduction in albumin levels compared to negative control.
Finally, in RBC there is a clear trend in favor of the Cell Salvage (p < 0.001), although the moderate heterogeneity between studies should be noted ( Fig. 5 ).
Regional GDP has a positive and highly significant impact (0.1687, p < 0.001), indicating that higher regional economic performance increases rental prices, reflecting the influence of economic conditions on housing demand.
According to Table 3 , farm size exhibits a highly significant positive correlation with information usage (p = 0.001), suggesting that larger farm sizes enable more intensive information application.
Among the examined genes, the expression levels of VPS 28 exhibited a highly significant statistical difference between the two groups in the MAFLD dataset (P < 0.001).
However, when the level of α-HBDH increased, the correlation between α-HBDH and in-hospital mortality showed an increasing trend ( P < 0.001).
Through the assessment of LWRs, the regression analysis revealed that the coefficients a and b were calculated as 0.0223 and 2.67, respectively, indicating a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001; r 2 = 0.974) ( Table 3 ) ( Fig. 3 ).
3.1.2 pH Biochar was the sole factor that had a highly significant effect (GLMM: p < 0.001) on soil pH ( Table 3 ).
All LLRs were highly significant (p < 0.001) with the most coefficients of determination values.