Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,842 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Very highly significant correlation coefficients ( r =0.7601, p <0.001) noticed between salt tolerant indices of survivability rate and root length as well as shoot length and shoot weight ( r =0.6997, 0.8897 p <0.001) indicate that they have very strong positive correlation among each other.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Combined analysis of variance for two years showed a highly significant (P < 0.001) to significant (P < 0.01) differences among groundnut varieties for grain yield, days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity, seeds per pod, pods per plant, 100 seed weight, except for both stand count at emergence and harvest.
moderately significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis A statistical analysis of collected data was carried out to highlight the significant differences between the yields of the three kinds of extraction used and investigated species, through the use of GraphPad prism 8.2.263 software, by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), then Tukey test to detect the degree of significance, this significance is taken at the probability of ∗p < 0.05 for a significant difference, ∗∗p < 0.01 for moderately significant difference, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for a highly significant difference, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 for a very highly significant difference (a high value of F means that something is significant, while a small value of p means that all results are significant, the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected from p < 0.05). 2.5.
highly significantP < 0.0030130.1× alphaqualifiedgold
2.2 Combining ability effects estimated The analysis of variance for the combining ability ( Table 3 ) revealed that the mean squares of GCA was positive and highly significant for the days to harvest (P < 0.003013), HPW (P < 0.0009951), HSW (P < 0.048880), SYH (P < 0.01811), pod length (P < 1,878e-07), pod width (P < 0.0011664), seed length (P < 0.006127), and seed width (0.04096).
partially significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Attention by gender to body attractiveness of the influencers was confirmed when it was verified that males placed faster attention (TFF = 0.33; p = 0.994), of longer duration (TFD = 3.99; p = 0.204), and with a higher number of fixations (FC = 7.33; p = 0.898), on the buttocks of the female influencer; the attention by females was partially significant with regard to the stimuli in which the male influencer showed his naked torso (E6-AOI3; TFF = 2.10, p = 0.004; TFD = 1.58, p = 0.001; FC = 3.59, p = 0.075), with the greatest differences being seen in E8-AOI 2 (TFD = 2.08, p =<0.001; FC = 5.73, p =<0.001).