The statistical analyses indicate that the overexpression was highly significant, with p < 0.01 vs. control for samples treated with 25 μM Aβ 25–35 peptide and with p < 0.001 vs. control for samples treated with EtOAc extract or with both Aβ 25–35 peptide and EtOAc extract.
Excerpts
In addition, the IDS activity expressions were 22.6% and 41.8% for c.254C>T and c.1025A>G mutations, respectively, which were highly significant compared to the wild type ( p < 0.01), and the IDS activity expression of c.851C>T was 62.3% which was significant compared to the wild type ( p < 0.05).
In our study, DL-glutamic acid, DL-aspartic acid, DL-citrulline, and spermidine were highly significant across all pain subgroups (MS/NV/NP) compared to controls ( p < 0.01), while DL-ornithine showed significance in MS and NV subgroups ( p < 0.05).
Additionally, Muribaculum exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with ileal IL-17A ( p < 0.01) and a significant negative correlation with hippocampal RORγt ( p < 0.05).
Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.
A correlation analysis between GL and GW showed a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) but negative association (r = −0.604 **) between these two traits.
The t -test of the above mentioned three parameters shows an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the two groups.
A clear and highly significant ( p < 0.01) in-crease in the abundance of transcripts of all glycosylases (MPG, TDG, and OGG1) was observed in the PCx after administration of the lower KYNA dose compared to the control group.
As shown in Figure 3 , the expression levels of the four candidate marker genes began to increase significantly after 0.5 h of chitin treatment ( p < 0.05), and their transcription levels reached a highly significant peak at 2–4 hpt ( p < 0.01) and then showed a decreasing trend.
GIP levels were lower in male Tg 5xFAD/- and Tg 5xFAD/5xFAD mice compared to non-Tg, but changes did not reach statistical significance in Tg 5xFAD/- mice ( p = 0.010 and p < 0.05, respectively) ( Figure S2A ).
Levels of significance were expressed as significant, p < 0.05 and highly significant, p < 0.01, respectively. 5.
Statistical analysis of the relative mRNA expression level between transcriptomic data and qPCR data was performed using Student’s t-test with SPSS 26.0 (v26) software, and the differences were considered significant when the p value < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when the p value < 0.01 (**). 5.
The expression of EDA was examined at different time points of PEDV infection, and the results showed that the EDA gene showed a highly significant upregulated expression at 24 h and 48 h ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 B).
Differences were considered significant when * p < 0.05, and extremely significant when ** p < 0.01.
The reduction in serum creatinine caused by captopril and chymostatin treatments was also highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Evident and highly significant ( p < 0.01) decreases in expression were recorded in the MBH and hippocampal CA1 in response to both KYNA doses in comparison to the control group; however, CAT transcript abundance in the CA1 was lower ( p < 0.05) in sheep infused with the KYNA20 dose than in those receiving the KYNA100 dose.
Statistical differences were designated as significant if p -values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant if p -values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01).
Statistical Analysis SPSS 17.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software was used for data analysis, Duncan’s test was used to test significance (‘*’ represent p < 0.05, significant; ‘**’ represent p < 0.01, highly significant).
The interaction of different lines and water status has a highly significant effect on CC, LA, PH, NNMS, BN, RWCL, and BIOMASS ( p < 0.01), a significant effect on SWPP ( p < 0.05), and no significant effect on the trait RECL. 2.2.
no supplementation) was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01) in the reduction of all inflammatory markers studied, with the reduction in the former group being markedly greater than in the latter.
Significant differences were considered at p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences were considered at p < 0.01(* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.
The mRNA expression level of Sp5-HTR1 in the gills showed highly significant downregulation ( p < 0.01) at 4 and 12 h ( Figure 4 D).
Bodyweight A three-way ANOVA evaluating change in bodyweight from 4 months (time of irradiation) to 11 months (beginning of behavior tests) of age revealed an unexpected highly significant main effect of radiation exposure ( p = 0.01) and an expected significant effect of sex ( p = 0.04) ( Figure 1 C).
Statistical differences were interpreted as significant at p ≤ 0.05 *, highly significant at p ≤ 0.01 **, and extremely significant at p ≤ 0.001 *** or p ≤ 0.0001 ****. 5.
The results of the SSP analysis of variance showed that temperature and tissue × gene have highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect on the expression of S. maximus PPAR genes.