In these mice, oxaliplatin caused a highly significant ( p < 0.01) preference towards a colder plate of the two used in the experiment involving 30–35 °C ( Figure 1 G) and 40–45 °C ( Figure 1 I).
Excerpts
Meanwhile, a non-significant value of lack of fit ( p > 0.05) and a highly significant level of the model ( p < 0.01) were obtained by statistical analyses, suggesting that the mode could be accurately predicted by the variation [ 38 ].
Differences were considered highly significant when p < 0.01.
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were revealed among the pomegranate varieties for the majority of measured contents.
Statistical Analysis The statistical estimation of the significance of the results obtained in the trials was performed using the ANOVA test, in which the objective was to compare the means between the control and treated groups, establishing significant probability values ( p ) < 0.05 [ 99 ] and considering the highly significant values of p < 0.01.
Table 1 and Table 2 show that both the full and reduced second-oder regression models were highly significant ( p < 0.01) and the lack-of-fits were insignificant ( p > 0.05).
test *± Standard deviation of three replicates, Asterisks (*) represent significant differences ( p < 0.05); double asterisks (**) represent highly significant differences ( p < 0.01). 4.
Compared with the CDP group, the C max of CA increased significantly ( p < 0.05), and V z/F of CA had a highly significant rise in the JGL group ( p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the AUC and MRT between the two groups.
Results are expressed as the mean ± SE, and the differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.
The linear term D, the interaction terms AB showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.01).
Subsequent analysis of variance (ANOVA, Table 3 ) corroborates these findings, demonstrating that ultrasonic power is a highly significant factor ( p < 0.01), while material-to-liquid ratio and extraction time are statistically significant ( p < 0.05).
The only exception was swertiamarin, which still showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01).
The average δ 13 C of C 3 plants was −26.7‰ ( n = 434), varying from −30.7 to −22.5‰, while the average δ 13 C of C 4 plants was −11.5‰ ( n = 47), varying from −14.2 to −10.2‰ ( Figure 1 a), which is a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01).
There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the granule size distribution of the three corn flours ( Table 1 ).
The results showed that STZ-diabetic rats exhibited a highly significant decrease in serum GSH levels relative to healthy controls ( p < 0.01), while those in groups treated with every concentration of both RR and BR showed a marked elevation relative to untreated diabetic rats ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 4 A).
Statistical analysis showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) among extraction solvents for all free radical-scavenging parameters evaluated; in particular, the extraction with ethanol showed the highest values of TPC (381 ± 113.1 mg GAE/g DW (Gallic acid equivalents/grams of dry weight)), DPPH • (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical)
The determination criteria were the following: R 2 of the fitted 4-parameter curve of ≥0.98, regression item should be highly significant ( p < 0.01), and deviation from parallel should not be significant ( p ≥ 0.01).
The ANOVA showed that the influence of treatment on colour, flavour, and texture was non-significant ( p > 0.05); however, a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) influence was observed on taste.
Among them, the eluent concentration and pH had extremely significant ( p < 0.01) effects on purified flavonoids ( Table 4 and Table 5 ).
Highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) were observed among the different doses of irradiation.
The results show that among the test variables used in this study, A (ratio of water to material), B (extraction temperature), and A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant for the extraction rate of EUPS ( p < 0.01).
From Figure 9 , we can observe a highly significant linear dependence between two methods (r = 0.9995, p < 0.01, n = 11).
In relation to non-diabetic vervet monkeys, total cholesterol and LDL levels remained unchanged at each experimental point ( Figure 1 A,B), while 4 weeks treatment promoted a highly significant increase of plasma HDL content in comparison with baseline (+118%, p = 0.012) and after 2 weeks of treatment (+90%, p = 0.008) ( Figure 1 C).
For the Reb A content, the interactions between time and probe diameter (T × PD), and probe diameter and amplitude (PD × A) did not have significant impact on the modifications in the content of this compound, whereas the interaction of the time and amplitude (T × A) factors showed slightly significant differences ( p = 0.02).
The difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.023). 2.3.