A Fisher’s exact test confirmed a highly significant association between stimulus type and sentence production ( p < .001, OR = 143.75), demonstrating that the target stimuli successfully and reliably elicited subjective motion sentences compared to controls.
Excerpts
Statistical results with a p-value p<0.05 are considered as significant, such with p<0.01 as highly significant, and such with p<0.001 as very highly significant.
All second order interactions with subject were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating substantial individual variability in how thresholds were affected by stimulation mode, electrode location, and auditory training.
A highly significant correlation was found between total calcium measured in all lithium-heparin and all citrate plasma aliquots (r = 0.991; p<0.001) ( Fig 1 ).
Detritus production Daily detritus production (mean±SD throughout) in pots containing sponges (all species combined; 12.3±10.5 mg DW) was considerably higher than controls without sponge (2.0±0.7 mg DW) and the difference was highly significant (linear mixed model, p<0.001, Fig. 5A ).
The microarray finding could be confirmed, and a statistically highly significant down regulation of PRKCDBP was found among the BCBM samples compared to the primary BC (p = 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).
By POD70, cochlear ablation resulted in a highly significant (ANOVA, p<0.001) areal reduction of 0.66 on the affected side, or a shrinkage by 34%.
The post hoc t -tests between the intensity groups and modalities were all highly significant ( p < 0.001).
There was a strong and highly significant (p<0.001, slope 1.038 se 0.1392; Fig 8 ) relationship between log woody debris volume and log basal area overall.
Feedback recipients, in contrast, showed a highly significant Outcomes x Timing interaction, F (1, 116) = 19.6, p < .001, η 2 = .14.
Precipitation seasonality was highly significant ( P <0.001) while the other variables were significant ( P <0.05) in predicting CWB distribution.
Then the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the post-test dart scores, which showed that the extremely significant difference between the two groups ( Z = -4.37, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.55), the performance of the self-talk group (median: 103.87; IQR: 3.52) was higher than that of the control group (median: 100.87; IQR: 0.75).
Due to missing values of patients without a partner, this variable was adjusted by comparing its regression with the total model, which was highly significant (HR 2.66, 95% CI 2.14–3.31, p = 0.001).
Analyses of variance (using the model Trait = Tree replicated in Harvests) confirmed the absence of significant differences of these two traits between individual trees, whereas there were highly significant differences (P<0.001) between the two harvests (not shown).
p <0.05 is considered significant; p <0.01 is considered highly significant; and p <0.001 is considered extremely significant.
Effects of VIL and NWT-03 supplementation in ZDF rats ( Table 2 ) GLP-1 levels trended higher (∼1.4-fold) after NWT-03 treatment (although this difference did not reach statistical significance), and were profoundly increased (∼5-fold, p<0.001) by VIL.
Highly significant two-way interaction effects between the length of the masking interval and the ball acceleration accounted for this response pattern (TE: F (4, 40) = 30.7, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 18.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 2; PE: F (4, 40) = 20.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 28.1, p<0.001 for Experiment 2).
Mixed effects model analysis showed that there were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between the 21–30 years group (youngest vaccinees) and the 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 groups, as well as a marginally significant difference (p = 0.092) between the 21–30 and the 61–72 years group ( Table 7 ).
The analysis of isolation-by-distance revealed a high and highly significant positive correlation between geographic and genetic distances ( r = 0.716, p <0.001).
The three distinct groups of samples observed in the 2D PCA scatter plot were found to be highly significant in the discriminant analysis (Wilks’ lambda = 0.003; F 6,787 = 4628.199; P <0.001).
Weight was used as a proxy for body size and showed a highly significant correlation with length (r = 0.98; p<0.001).
Generalized Linear Model A likelihood ratio test comparing the null and the full Generalized Linear Model was highly significant (χ 2 = 225, df = 7, P< 0.001) ( Table 5 ).
Seedling morphometrics In 2005, distance had a highly significant effect on number of leaves per seedling, with more leaves per seedling away (7.6±0.3 leaves) than close (6.2±0.2; F 1, 97 = 12.54, P <0.001).
In the CTRL group, an increase of BLI was observed, while in the group treated with NTP (NTP group) a highly significant stabilization was induced by the treatment (p<0,001 at D30).
The correlation between expectations and previous grades was highly significant and positive ( r = .89, p < .001) and significantly higher than the correlation between aspirations and previous grades ( r = .54, p < .001), z = 5.24, p = .001.