Results Evolutionary allometry The multivariate regression of Procrustes coordinates (PRC) on centroid size (CS) is highly significant ( F 1, 42 = 32.18; P <0.001), accounting for 12.93% of total shape variation ( Fig. 2 ).
Excerpts
However, highly significant differences were found ( p <0.001) between groups G 6 vs.
Notably, plasmablasts from the Advax 10mg group had a highly significant ~5-fold upregulation of AID expression (p = 0.001) when compared to the TIV alone group ( Fig 5A ).
The analysis revealed a strong response in the cells to MYO1C over-expression in form of a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the number of live cells starting at 48 hours post transfection and throughout the experiment time span ( Fig 3D ).
Two-way ANOVA indicated that accession group, population, and their interaction effects were highly significant ( p -values < 1e-03) across the G . max populations.
The two-tailed Student's t -test with unequal variance showed that the differences was statistically significant ( P<0.05 ) for metronidazole and clarithromycin and highly significant for fluoroquinolone ( P<0.001 ).
Within the present study, comparisons between shell surface temperatures of mussels measured by IR imagery and internal body temperatures measured with digital thermocouples (4 Channel Data Logging Thermometer 800024, SPER SCIENTIFIC Ltd.) also revealed highly significant positive correlations when assessed in the field (r 2 = 0.96, n = 122, p<0.001, y = 0.9722x+1.1239).
Given an average BMI of 31 in our sample this corresponds to a remarkable effect of more than 13%, which is highly significant with a t-value of 4.3 (p<0.001).
Then the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the post-test dart scores, which showed that the extremely significant difference between the two groups ( Z = -4.37, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.55), the performance of the self-talk group (median: 103.87; IQR: 3.52) was higher than that of the control group (median: 100.87; IQR: 0.75).
This regression was highly significant (p<0.001) with an adjusted R-squared value of 0.62.
These differences in identification success between 454 and IPE reads are highly significant for each of the SSR n-mer classes (P<0.001, based on G -tests).
There was a significant trend (linear trend: F (1,17) = 57.302, P <0.001; quadratic trend: F (1,17) = 8.250, P = 0.011).
In a bivariate analysis Table 3 shows, there is a highly significant association ( p- value < 0.001) present between the age group and visiting healthcare to receive healthcare facilities, and this significance is present in all of the countries of our study.
The most frequent model (59.04% of the simulations) had a medium-high correlation (Rho = 0.595) and was statistically highly significant (p<0.001) using five environmental variables: sea surface temperature, cloud fraction (max), photosynthetically available radiation (medium), dissolved oxygen in seawater and water clarity.
The differences in CBSV infection among cassava varieties was highly significant (ANOVA, F 2,6 = 24.1, P<0.001).
Limiting this analysis to those who never reported a Ct diagnosis, again a significant trend (p = 0.001) in seropositivity was found at all ages.
The correlation of stGTV and dwGTV was highly significant (r = 0.995, p<0.001).
All reported reductions were highly significant (p<0.001) due to the forced modeling.
The mixed model analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of species and of treatment on T leaf ( Table 1 ; p < 0.001).
In total, we observed HNF1B expression in 66% of gynecologic and 56% of renal neoplasms with cytoplasmic clearing, compared to 5% and 16%, respectively, without cytoplasmic clearing, and compared to 1% of other neoplasms, all highly significant differences ( P <0.001; two-tailed Fisher exact tests) ( Fig. 1D , and Table S1 ).
We find that round is highly significant, regardless of the control variables being added or not (t = -0.064; p<0.001), suggesting a systematic reduction in effort (i.e., an increase in efficiency) over the repetition of the scenarios.
We found a highly significant effect of ‘Text Displayed’ on ‘Text Produced’ (Pearson Chi-square, d.f. = 1, Deviance = 126.09, p<0.001).
The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.99 for all lower limb segments ( figure 4A left), and were all highly significant (p<0.001).
It is peculiar why the AOR for female compared to male was less than 1 (AOR=0.569) and highly significant (p <.001). c.
The overall effect of generational cohort on the group of variables was highly significant (Wilk’s Lambda, df = 6, 284, F = 49.32, p < . 001 , partial eta squared = .510, a large effect size).