Excerpts

Results The genotype effect was highly significant (p < 0.01) for all traits analyzed, evidencing the existence of genetic variability for these traits in the studied population.

The number of individuals per month for June, July, August, September, and October was 405, 1390, 5226, 2573, and 781, respectively, and the difference between the months was extremely significant ( Fig 3 ) (P < 0.01), which is also related to the growth period of corn.

At the 95% probability level, the results showed that the fertilizer concentration and sediment concentration of the type-H 1 drip irrigation tape reached the extremely significant level (p < 0.01).

Meanwhile a highly significant and negative relationship between the Kc values and the contents of 1.0–0.25 mm and 0.25–0.05 mm were found under the air-dried state condition ( p < 0.01, R 2 = 0. 3754 & 0.3500, respectively).

If the same association was 1.) supported by three different tests, 2.) was highly significant for at least one of them ( p ≤ 0.01), and 3.) was shared by the females and males of the same species or even by different species, then we deemed the outcome as reliable and reported it in detail.

85 out of 136 (63%) correlation coefficients ( N = 55185) were significantly positive, with 73 (54%) of the coefficients highly significant ( p < .001), 9 (7%) of those moderately significant ( p < .01), and 3 (2%) of those weakly significant ( p < .05).

However, marital status was highly significant (P≤0.01) and positively correlated with the males’ BMI (β* = 0.22, r 2 = 0.05), while females had low significance (P ≤ 0.05) as indicated by regression analysis (β = 0.26, r 2 = 0.07).

One-way ANOVA of the virus accumulation in the control and treatment groups were highly significant, ( P <0.01) for DWV ( F = 11.83, df = 23 P = 0.00234; Cohen’s d = 1.473107, large effect size), and ( P <0.001) for VDV-1 ( F = 17.95, df = 23.

IPSPs showed a highly significant (P< 0.01) beta frequency component, which was highly significantly coherent with both the Layer II and V LFP oscillation (which were in antiphase to each other).

The best model fit was considered the most parsimonious model that exhibited both highly significant test statistics ( P < 0.01) and a robust adjusted R 2 value.

This effect is highly significant (p<0.01) from the last until the 8th quarter before death and influenced by age.

Results revealed highly significant differences (P < 0.01) among provenances, sites, and their interactions for all traits.

The distance effect on the detection rate was highly significant (GLMM: F = 9.90, P < 0.01).

The correlation coefficient between twelve MRMs in swab and milk samples was highly significant (r > 0.60 and P < 0.01), and included: three PE lipids; a PG lipid; a PC lipid; five TAGs; stearoylcarnitine, hexadecanedioic acid mono-L-carnitine ester; and PG (36:2)/PI(30:4).

Data are represented as the mean ± SD of triplicate independent experiments and statistically extremely significant differences compared with the negative control (** P < 0.01).

There was a highly significant ( P < 0 . 01 ) correlation between protein content of B . impatiens and the starch content in roots with a correlation coefficient of 0.907.

Moreover, we have recorded the highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.83, p < 0.01) of both genes relative transcript abundances ( S4 Table ).

Intra-cluster correlations (Pearson r or Spearman Rho with a non-parametric distribution in the scatter plot) were all highly significant with p < .01.

The difference in the number of blood-borne bacteria recovered from the mice infected with the knock-in mutant versus the srfH deletion strain was highly significant (p-value = 0.01).

The difference between both the probability and subtraction model with four CPGs and the experimental values in the mean and median IPIs, and the IPI standard deviation was highly significant (P<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test, followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test, Table 1 ).

The mean number of generations increased in a highly significant linear relationship against k for both locations (( Fig. 3 , p <0.01 from regression results), with Erie and Stuarts Draft experiencing an additional 0.15 and 0.10 generations per year under the largest DTR condition ( k = 0.4).

Out of the 28 possible correlation pairs, there were 23 highly significant (p< 0.01) and two significant (p< 0.05) correlations.

One day after the first vaccination, a highly significant (P < 0.01) increase in H/L ratios was observed in all vaccinated groups when compared to the pre-vaccination time ( Table 1 ).

Additionally, the Kao test shows a highly significant Augmented Dickey-Fuller statistic (p < 0.01), further supporting the presence of cointegration in the panel data.

However, the PI of these precursors showed a trend to decline in high-risk MDS, reaching minimal proliferation values in RAEB-2, intermediate-2, high-risk IPSS MDS and AML patients (p≤0.01 vs . normal BM, RA and low-risk MDS) ( Table 2 ).