Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) The disease severity records were used to calculate the area under disease progress curve (%-days), which revealed a highly significant (P<0.01) difference between the sorghum genotypes that were examined in both cropping years.
Excerpts
Only one category showed an increasing trend, kayaks spread out with whales (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.01).
This increase was statistically highly significant (p<0.01).
Highly significant group effect was found on the affective thresholds (F(1,39) = 7.473, p<0.01) whereby affective thresholds were significantly lower in the MDD compared to the HC group.
Linear regression showed an R 2 of 0.6104, and a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson’s r ) ( r = 0.78, p < 0.01).
The highly significant variables (P<0.01) where chosen to a preliminary CAP ( Figure S1A ) and partial CAP analysis ( Figure S1B ).
In contrast, rHDL containing S1P had a highly significant, protective influence ex vivo , and in vivo (-50%, p<0.01).
The significance thresholds were deemed as significant ( p ≤0.05), highly significant ( p ≤0.01), or very highly significant ( p ≤0.001).
Meanwhile a highly significant and negative relationship between the Kc values and the contents of 1.0–0.25 mm and 0.25–0.05 mm were found under the air-dried state condition ( p < 0.01, R 2 = 0. 3754 & 0.3500, respectively).
General costs Both humans and monkeys showed highly significant general costs in terms of ER, as previously defined (humans: 2.7%, F(1, 7) = 18.7, P<0.01; M1: 4.7%, F(1, 81) = 46,7, P<0.0001; M2: 2.9%, F(1, 39) = 46.7, P<0.0001; Figure 6 ).
The most highly significant association was with p75 (Cohort 1, p<0.01; Cohort 2, p<0.005).
When compared with the control group, the increase of P1 larvae after 10 μM U0126 treatment was highly significant (p<0.01; Fig. 3G ).
All these associations are highly significant at P<0.01.
A 2–fold change expression cut-off for ratio experiments was applied together with anti-correlation of ratio profiles rendering the microarray analysis highly significant (P-value >0.01), robust and reproducible.
The post hoc Fisher analysis revealed highly significant differences between WM and IC animals in both Sp1 and Sp2 (p<0.01) and also significant differences in Sp3 (p<0.03).
Statistic significance was defined as follow: p <0.001 or ***, extremely significant; p <0.01 or **, very significant; p <0.05 or *, significant; and p >0.05 or ns, not significant.
Genes Related to Epigenetic Regulatory Mechanisms Regardless of treatment, a two-way ANOVA showed that the differences between hepatic and intestinal levels of expression of five target genes related to epigenetic regulatory mechanisms were statistically significant ( P <0.05) or highly significant ( P <0.01; P <0.001) ( Table 3 and S3 Table ), being in general higher in the intestine.
brevis 205 , the MPO activity was highly significant (p<0.01) ( Table 2 ).
Most importantly, there was a highly significant interaction between pre-exposure frequency and visit type (F(6,164) = 5.4; p<0.01).
The asterisks indicate a highly significant difference (p<0.01) between the test and control groups as analyzed by one-way ANOVA.
There was a highly significant association between the use of interventions to tackle HypoMgT and the incidence of PHT ( p < 0.01).
The expression was highly significant ( p < 0.01) in all genes compared with control.
the mouth) group and Accuracy (Spearman r = 0.21, p <0.05), and a marginally significant correlation between the eyes group and Sensitivity ( r = 0.30, p <0.01).
There was a significant trend towards decreasing 30-day mortality rates over the three phases for total splenic injury patients who underwent splenectomy/splenorrhaphy ( p <0.01).
In particular, the frequency of LBW-PTB shows a decreasing trend (i.e., less frequent births compared with the average number of births per day) for weekends (p < 0.01), Holiday (p < 0.01), and Long Holiday (p < 0.01).