Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
State v.11 Fisher’s exact test confirmed a significant association between geminin and nuclear c-Abl ( p-value = 0.0006, Table S1 ), and spearman correlation coefficient test also confirmed the highly significant correlation between expression of geminin and nuclear c-Abl with r = 0.5432 ( p = 0.0001).
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For ratings of the extent to which a speaker was being ironic, there were highly significant main effects of Statement ( F (1,32) = 87.7; p <0.0001, η p 2 = 0.72) and Occupation ( F (1,32) = 13.5; p = 0.0009, η p 2 = 0.30), as well as a significant Statement X Occupation interaction ( F (1,32) = 8.2; p = 0.007, η p 2 = 0.20), a group X occupation interaction ( F (2,64) = 4.2; p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.11) and a significant Statement X Occupation X Group interaction ( F (3,96) = 5.0; p = 0.032, η p 2 = 0.13).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis supported these findings: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed a highly significant treatment effect (p < 0.0001), with Dunnett’s post hoc tests revealing intense erythema and edema responses only in the positive control (MD 1.48–3.83, p < 0.0001), while Novostron did not differ from the negative control at any observation point.
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Soil biological characteristics The analysis of variance using a GLMM showed highly significant differences (P <0.0001) for the abundance of macroinvertebrate orders between distance to the crown of the tree (below or outside) (29.26 ± 2.22 and 22.66 ± 1.77 below and outside of crown, respectively, Fig 1 ).
highly significantP<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regression analysis of the cured percentage in untreated patients versus the odds ratio of the ten studies analyzed and presented in table S2, revealed a highly significant linear relationship (Spearman Rho = −0.842, adjusted R2 = 0.806, P<0.0001) indicating that centers with good surgical results do not benefit from pretreatment and centers with worse surgical results benefit most from pretreatment.
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The foliar area consumed with infestation at flowering ( Fig 9 Left) showed a highly significant effect of Species, Stage, Variety, Species x Variety and Species x Stage x Variety (p<0.0001 in all the cases), as well as a Stage x Species (p = 0.0019) and Stage x Variety (p = 0.0042).