The difference in unique alleles between lines was 43,194 SNPs and highly significant ( P <0.0001).
Excerpts
Highly significant association was found between naive CD4 T cells and CD4+ RTE (all p-values <0.0001).
Consistent with the PCoA plots, clustering by reactors was highly significant (R = 0.65, p<0.0001).
The statistical significance of these differences is highlighted by the asterisks (****) in the figure, indicating highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the groups.
The comparison was highly significant (P = 0.0001), suggesting that harvest time is also a determining factor in the amount of ART in A. annua herbal teas.
The difference between the unconditioned and PBM conditioned light damage groups was highly significant ( p<0.0001 ), as were the differences between the saffron-conditioned and unconditioned groups ( p<0.0001 ), and between the combined-conditioned and unconditioned groups ( p<0.0004 ).
2D showed that induced cell migration by synthetic activation of PI3K is statistically highly significant (p<0.0001), while endogenous activation of Rac does not cause a significant increase in cell migration.
This level of therapeutic efficacy was highly significant, with a Fisher’s exact test 95% CI range of 79.7–99.9% (p<0.0001).
ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of condition. with maximum in the lower gamma range at 30–45 Hz (p<0.0001, Fig. 3 ).
Significant factors for the prediction of SVR For the prediction of SVR, factor X 21 (EVR) was highly significant and had a high χ 2 value (p<0.0001; table 3 ).
These data indicate overall higher sST2 concentrations in males than females, which is highly significant after adjusting for age (effect estimate 49% lower in women [95% CI 42% to 55%], p<0.0001) ( Table 1 ).
FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).
All dimensions of the SSQ12 questionnaire (Speech, Spatial, Qualities of Hearing, and overall score) revealed highly significant subjective benefit ( p < 0.0001).
To determine if the effect of FMR4 on cell proliferation is reproducible in other human cell lines we carried out a similar experiment using HeLa cells and found that all three siRNAs against FMR4 also resulted in highly significant decreases in cell proliferation in comparison to control siRNA (P<0.0001) ( Figure 6B ).
ANOSIM comparisons indicated highly significant (p≤0.0001) differences among strata in the distribution of ant genera and species diversity, and NMDS analysis showed clear separation between the three strata ( Figure 2 ).
This co-infection was highly significant, despite the co-clustering of M. mitochondrii genotype A in OTU Midichloria 1 with genotype B ( p <0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).
Although there were highly significant differences in caudate and putaminal SUVR values between the controls and PD patients ( P < 10 -4 for caudate, P < 10 -22 for putamen), there was greater range of overlapping SUVR values derived from the PET-guided method between the two diagnostic groups ( Fig 3 ).
The difference between p35S : cOBE3 wus-1/+ and empty vector wus-1/+ control is highly significant in both seedling and shoot stages (both Chi square, p<0.0001).
For the five oceans under investigation a significant trend was found (p<0.0001, significance level of 0.05).
The Q test for heterogeneity was highly significant between studies (p<0.0001), and the I 2 statistic was 99%, indicating high heterogeneity.
A Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test indicated a highly significant effect of category on daily movement distance (χ2 = 235.91, df = 2, p < 0.0001).
The mean (standard deviation) number of days from vaccination to onset of symptoms for influenza-positive subjects was 119 (21) compared with 109 (32) for influenza-negative subjects, with a significant trend for increasing risk ( P <0.0001) of a positive influenza result in the unadjusted analysis considering days elapsed since vaccination to onset of symptoms ( Table 4 ).
Similarly, the relationship between airway resistance and airflow into the lungs was highly significant, following a logarithmic curve (p<0.0001; Fig. 1C ).
Statistical analysis supported these findings: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed a highly significant treatment effect (p < 0.0001), with Dunnett’s post hoc tests revealing intense erythema and edema responses only in the positive control (MD 1.48–3.83, p < 0.0001), while Novostron did not differ from the negative control at any observation point.
(TIFF) S1 Table The results of the one-way ANOVA for each figure panel are summarized as follows. In Fig 1B , a highly significant treatment effect was observed (F = 265.6, P < 0.0001), indicating substantial differences between the treatment groups.