Excerpts

As a cross-check, calculated (via DIC and TA) and directly measured pH values were compared and showed a highly significant correlation and no outliers (pH (total scale) = 0.9176 pH (NBS) +0.5453; r 2 = 0.99; p<0.0001).

Temperature effects on mycelial growth of different Fusarium species According to ANOVA, the average effects of different temperatures on fungal radial growth of Fusarium species were highly significant at P < 0 . 0001 .

There was a highly significant effect of basking position on the maximum body temperature reached ( F 2,86 = 998.8, P <0.0001) the greatest temperatures being reached with the most open wings ( Fig 3 ).

Age ranged between 2.0 and 5.2 years in the animals from the low-fluoride areas and between 1.6 and 13.3 years in those from the high-fluoride area ( Table 2 ) The difference in bone fluoride concentration between the two groups was highly significant (p < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference existed for age (p = 0.12) ( Table 2 ).

Firstly, the association with poor physical health was very high in men (OR 4.08 (without T2D) and 11.34 (with T2D)) and women (OR 3.39 (without T2D) and 5.05 (with T2D)), with both associations highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Both F ST (0.172) and Φ PT (0.254) statistics revealed the presence of highly significant genetic differences among sites (P <0.0001 and P <0.001 respectively) ( Table 2 ); as expected, Φ PT values exceeded those of F ST .

conventional FA concentrations in 2 tables, about 2 findings of P = 0.05 and 0.5 finding of P = 0.01 can be expected there by chance alone, but our key findings are highly significant ( P <0.0001) and not vulnerable to Type-I errors (incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis).

All three ratios showed highly significant power exponent β (β for ratio between systolic and diastolic SR long = −0.07±0.02, p<0.0001; β for ratio between systolic and diastolic SR circ = −0.06±0.01, p<0.0001; β for ratio between systolic and diastolic SR rad = −0.06±0.02, p<0.0001).

The effects of the study drugs on gut microbiome β-diversity at the OTU level were first tested statistically using a two-way NPMANOVA and the results revealed highly significant main effects for drug (F 4,65 = 3.35; p = 0.0001) and time (F 2,65 = 8.43, p = 0.0001), as well as a significant interaction (F 8,65 = 1.77, p = 0.0001).

When all observations of Xe effects on freezing at PR-LTM1 were pooled from these two independent experiments (Air-exposure, n = 20; Xe-exposure, n = 21) there was a highly significant reduction in freezing both to context alone ( t 39 = 4.63, P<0.0001) and context + tone ( t 39 = 2.16, P<0.01) compared to air-exposed controls.

The results show highly significant (P<0.0001) inputs on the outputs as the delta-PSI, MR, and the SN values according to the statistical significance (P, 2 tail) analysis, as seen before in the sensitivity analysis.

The number of scales did not show significant differences among the four southern phenotypes (diagonal, vertical and longitudinal bars, and stellate spot; GLM: all p>0.4), whereas the difference was highly significant between these four phenotypes and the round spot skin pattern (GLM: t = 11.9, p<0.0001).

The meta-regression of the year over logit-transformed prevalence showed a trend towards an increasing prevalence of beta-blocker use from 1995 to 2015 with a slope of 0.1 (p<0.0001).

Significant factors for the prediction of SVR For the prediction of SVR, factor X 21 (EVR) was highly significant and had a high χ 2 value (p<0.0001; table 3 ).

Box plots for the results of A , showing highly significant difference ( p <0.0001).

[ 46 ] assessed the accuracy of the Invu system at recording the FHR using simultaneous CTG; a highly significant correlation was reported been the two modalities (r = 0.92, p<0.0001).

For example, Fig 5 shows one example of a highly significant relationship between the date and phi (β = 1.779, p<0.0001).

Here the application of CRMP-5 led to a highly significant increase in the amount of RGCs (p<0.0001).

For SCO the total number of patches (average of 24.6 patches +/- 0.770) was found to be highly significant increased (p < 0.0001) compared to NSP (17.7 +/- 0.465), ( Fig 4A ).

The results presented in Figure 1B–C clearly support our hypothesis: antibody treatment did not significantly impact tumor growth in B16.F10 challenged mice ( P = 0.1850); whereas the effect on B16.F10-GP challenged mice were highly significant ( P <0.0001).

In this analysis, group differences in subjective pain scores were highly significant before controlling for the effect of anterior cingulate cortex activation ( F = 38.0, P <0.0001); a finding that was reversed ( F = 1.8, P = 0.195) when removing (regressing out) this effect.

All variables included in the SDMs were highly significant for both the pine and the disease (p-value < 0.0001).

Spearman's rank correlation for race frequency between the three collection efforts was highly significant for all cases (p<0.0001; Rho for 1950*1975 = 0.72, 1950*2005 = 0.63, and 1975*2005 = 0.73) and also between each of these efforts and the whole sample (p<0.0001; Rho 0.77, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively for 1950, 1975 and 2005).

The eigenvalues showed that LD1 was highly significant (F 75,28 = 5.62; P<0.0001), while LD2 was marginally non-significant (F 48,20 = 1.88; P = 0.062) and LD3 was not significant (F 23,11 = 1.37; p = 0.3).

The V/O relationship was highly significant at all ages ( P <0.0001, linear regression model), but neither the gradient ( P = 0.0961) nor the intercept ( P = 0.649) changed with age.