Excerpts

spiralis , respectively), and were highly significant in all cases ( P <0.0001).

Statistical analysis using Mann Whitney test showed that the differences between control and treated groups were highly significant with P value <0.0001 in all cases ( Figure 6 ).

On the other hand, the group of subjects who received PI vaccination showed a trend toward an increase in the median IgG titer (median values of 0.3 to 579 (P<0.0001), 0.00–401.4 (P = 0.3125), and 971.3 to 2163 (P = 0.3008) in group 1,2, and 3 respectively), except slight decrease of IgG value for Group 4 (median value of 1067 to 1021; P = 0.9717).

Sedation under ketamine and alfaxalone remained highly significant from control throughout physiological monitoring (P1: ketamine, 12 min:13.0±2.4, P <0.0001; alfaxalone, 11 min: 10.6±1.8, P = 0.0002; P2: ketamine, 19 min: 13.5±2.6, P <0.0001; alfaxalone, 16 min: 10.9±2.6, P = 0.0005); and animals under ketamine remained highly sedated upon returning to cage (28 min: 12.7±2.4, P <0.0001), whereas sedation under alfaxalone reduced more rapidly toward conscious levels (22 min: 8.6±2.7, P = 0.0059).

The effect of sex was highly significant in each cohort (P < 0.0001 in each cohort), with females more active than males ( Table 3 ).

This model was highly significant (p<10 −4 ) and explained 7.5% of the variation in African ancestry levels between individuals (adjusted R 2 ).

After logarithmic transformation of light intensity and cfu counts ≥7.5×10 4 cfu/ml, the Pearson two-tailed test indicated a highly significant correlation (P<0.0001).

When comparing the haplogroup origin distribution between provinces and comarcas the difference is highly significant (χ 2 p-value <0.0001), since, as expected, virtually all the samples with a TMA from the three comarcas (Ngäbe-Buglé, Emberá-Wounaan, and Kuna Yala) show Native American mtDNAs (99.2%).

aegypti genes are without introns compared to 33% of the EZGs, and this difference is highly significant (P<0.0001).

The miro1 (+/−) / miro2-2 (−/−) plants showed highly significant (P<0.0001) additional impairment of pollen tube growth compared to the miro1 (+/−) alone ( Figure 6 ).

The ANOVA yielded a highly significant 4-way interaction: F (8, 320) = 19.06, p < .0001, partial η 2 = .33.

The results reveal a highly significant positive correlation between flower size and head diameter at the basal, middle and apical zone of the head (r 2 = 0.56, P< 0.0001).

The ANOSIM yielded a highly significant difference in the chemical patterns of the two groups ( ANOSIM : r = 0.9, p = 0.0001).

Relative to central hospitals, patients at hospitals in the most peripheral quartile had significantly higher odds of death, but patients at hospitals in quartile 2 were no different from the reference, and those in quartile 3 were borderline significant for reduced mortality (OR (95% CI): Q1 2.10 (1.76–2.51), p<0.0001; Q2 1.00 (0.87–1.15), p = 0.997; Q3 0.89 (0.79–1.00), p = 0.050; Q4 (reference)).

This was highly significant ( p <0.0001).

There was a highly significant positive correlation between glucose and glycogen (Spearman r = -0.4102, p<0.0001, S1A Fig ), and a negative correlation between pH and glycogen (Spearman r = -0.5418, p<0.0001, S1B Fig ).

The effects of the initial MC (A) and inlet air temperature (B) on the final MC were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), that of feed rate (C) was generally significant, and that of inlet velocity (D) on deposition rate was not significant.

FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).

Intriguingly, the sorted IFNβ + Tip-DCs also stimulated the naïve T cells to proliferate in a highly significant manner (p < 0.0001 as compared to macrophages) and more efficiently than the sorted IFNβ/YFP − bona fide Tip-DCs ( Figure 6 ).

A chi-square test showed that the difference between children and adults was highly significant (p-value< 0.0001).

As shown in Figure 8 and Table 1 , the (N2) wild type worms showed a highly significant longevity extension when treated with 100 μM and 50 μM CA (LogRank p<0.0001), as compared to controls.

The ANCOVA analysis revealed highly significant differences between the elevations (F = 19.07, DFn = 1, DFd = 205, P < 0.0001). 3.2.3 Determination of antibody avidity maturation We determined the relative avidity index to appraise the antibody binding strength ( Fig 5 ).

Unless otherwise stated, all the relationships reported are highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Significant factors for the prediction of SVR For the prediction of SVR, factor X 21 (EVR) was highly significant and had a high χ 2 value (p<0.0001; table 3 ).

Independent repetition of the cross confirmed this finding; statistical analysis revealed that the result is highly significant (P value <0.0001 by the Pearson’s chi-squared test).