Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

Marker-by-marker analyses of rs1800888, rs1042718 and rs1042719 of ADRB2 in the present study and the previous published analyses of rs1042713 and rs1042719 [4] showed nominally significant association with waist-to-hip ratio and systolic blood pressure in line with the results seen for haplotype pairs.
The analysis of Belgian CD trios revealed only nominally significant associations with the major alleles (i.e. allele frequency in controls >50%) of four SNPs, three of which are located in the haplotype block encompassing the region covering the MEFV promoter to intron 2 and its 5′ flanking region (rs182674( A ): p = 0.029; rs224217( G ): p = 0.052; rs224231( G ); p = 0.039; rs6501170( T ): p = 0.016; the risk nucleotides are indicated in brackets) ( Figure 2A , Table S1 ).
With the Dreadnought Grey disc the value of α was closest to 1.0, and was different from this value at only a marginally significant level, implying that in this condition the birds landed nearly randomly all over the test surface even though this grey disc is (at least for humans) clearly distinguishable from the Kingfisher Blue background ( Figure 3 ).
For example, at day 52, when the effects of the dual infection are most pronounced based on MANOVA and LDA, ANOVA results show a marginally significant difference for IFNγ between PLV and non-PLV infections, and significant differences for IFNγ and FAS between FIVC and non-FIVC infections, suggesting that IFNγ is a strong driver of group discrimination.
So while there may be significant variance components in siRNA activity associated with the siRNA's target, these appear to have no statistically significant influence on the outcomes of predictive models when removing overlapping siRNAs from training partitions, or at least not specifically to the SVM technique applied to the P+25 feature method.
highly significantqualifiedgold
E14.5-E15.5 is a key time point in liver development signaling the loss of hematopoiesis The cluster analysis unexpectedly revealed that, at both a proteomic and transcriptomic level, highly significant differences existed between E14.5 and E15.5 compared to differences between E11.5 and E14.5 ( Figure 3 ).