Sensitivity analysis excluding women with cervical dilatation > 6 cm n = 270) showed similar, highly significant associations between the total score of the GebStart-tool and all intervals describing care needs (p < 0.001 for all associations).
Excerpts
Results We found that the condition in which the dogs were tested had a highly significant effect on how long the dogs manipulated the apparatus (LMM, N = 20, F 2,36 = 12.478, P≤0.001, Figure 3 ).
The mean difference in z-scores between the groups was highly significant (p<0.001) for all three indicators.
This applies especially to the correlation between compassion and prosocial behavior, which did not survive correction for multiple testing, as well as to the effect of SoVT empathy, which was highly significant (p < .001), yet based on exploratory analyses.
Electron microscopy of 800 spinal axons (400 hypoxic, 400 normoxic, 100 axons per animal) left and right of the anterior median fissure from adult hypoxic and normoxic animals and subsequent data analysis (Sigma Plot) indicated a) absence of the Normality criterion for the data distribution ( Shapiro-Wilk Test ) and b) highly significant differences in the g-ratios as well as axon diameters between the hypoxic and normoxic group with p< 0.001 (each) using the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test and the Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks .
Identities were accepted in some cases if the above parameters were met and only one peptide match was found along with an expected value that was highly significant ( P <0.001) for the peptide match and the MASCOT protein score was 70 or greater for that single peptide match.
The results showed the presence of highly significant (p<0.001) differences among locations and genotypes, reflecting the existence of differential responses among genotypes in varied locations.
For patient 28 the difference between the means for the 2 sides was highly significant (p<0.001 on Grubb’s test, and outside the outer fence on Tukey’s test), indicating that this patient was an outlier from the other patients in terms of side variation.
The interactions of HS x PR only resulted in a highly significant difference (P<0.001) in the onset day of egg laying in quail birds ( Table 3 ).
A highly significant correlation (R 2 = 0.78; p<0.001) was observed between these two estimates and we obtained the following simple linear regression: Chl-a probe = Chl-a spectro * 0.1445 + 2.9809.
In addition, we see that Immersion shows a highly significant effect as a predictor of Rating (β = 1.18, s.e. = 0.07, t = 16.87, p < 0.001, see S1 Statistical Models modelALLrate ), indicating that higher degrees of immersion lead to higher rating scores.
The regression model explained highly significant proportions ( P < 0.001) and 43%, 34%, 35%, 49% of total variance in the 2018EC ranking for 50m, 100m, 200m, and 400m races, respectively.
Follow-up analyses revealed highly significant effects of the MMN in the frontal cluster from 540 ms to 590 ms (290–340 ms lc; cluster 1, main effect “stimulus”: F (1,16) = 19.64; p<0.001; 29 dipoles; Fig 3E left) with no hemispheric dominance (“stimulus x hemisphere”: F (1,16) = 2.78; p = 0.12).
The relationship between tree size and hollow presence was highly significant in our model (Wald statistic = 388.1; P <0.001).
These increases in ADCC potency for hu3F8-Ile relative to hu3F8 were highly significant (p<0.001).
It was observed that Iranian ecotypes do not mate randomly, giving highly significant probabilities for at least 9 of the 11 SSRs, according to the Chi-Square and probability tests (p<0.001).
Violin plots ( Fig 8A and 8B ) revealed highly significant differences in PFKFB3 and DDIT3 expression between the control and OA groups (*** P < 0.001): both genes were highly expressed in controls and significantly downregulated in OA—consistent with prior differential analysis and RF results.
The difference between mFPR1 -/- mice and WT-mice was highly significant either among the CD11b + - (153±32 vs 102±24 (p<0,001)) and the Ly6G + -cells (WT126±21 vs mFPR1 -/ 85±22 (p<0,001)).
The results from the SEM indicate a good model fit; the chi-squared ( χ 2 ) value was highly significant ( p < .001), as were the values of the goodness-of-fit index (GFI; 0.94), the comparative fit index (CFI; 0.92), and the mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; 0.012), which implies that the model fits the data well.
5A , the escape latency in either control or tg mice dramatically decreased following training, and a within-group one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in both control [F(5,54) = 24.82, p<0.001] and tg mice [F(5,54) = 18.67, p<0.001], indicating that all these mice were able to learn the task.
There were also highly significant interactions between the juvenile and gravid female probabilities of occurrence in relation to both abundance and maximum temperature ( P <0.001; Fig. 5A–B ), suggesting a disconnect between microclimate influence on reproductive effort and successful recruitment.
The multivariate regression of the shape component on size, estimated by the logarithm of the centroid size, was highly significant (F = 16.5, p <0.001, dl = 105).
On the other hand, all these variables showed highly significant correlations between the two sessions (RT r = 0.880, p<0.001; global accuracy r = 0.860, p<0.001; target accuracy r = 0.827, p<0.001).
LPS stimulation as well as incubation with lambda-carrageenan resulted in highly significant induction of TNF-α transcription compared to unstimulated control (p < 0.001 for LPS stimulation and lambda-carrageenan).
The adjusted model was highly significant ( p <0.001) but explained only 3.5% of the variance in the outcome measures.