One-way ANOVA was followed by LSD multiple comparisons and the Wilcoxon test when nonparametric tests were necessary ( p < 0.05 was considered significant, and p < 0.01 was considered highly significant).
Excerpts
Correlation analysis revealed strong, statistically highly significant correlations between the Incidence of OS-associated procedures I OS and regional HDI ( r = 0,830; p < 0.01) as well as regional gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ( r = 0,761; p < 0.01; Table 5 ).
3 a–d) showed that OM in sediment before the LWLO had a highly significant positive correlation with TN (r = 0.699, p < 0.01) and a significant positive correlation with TP (r = 0.567, p < 0.05), while OM in sediment during the LWLO had a highly significant positive correlation with TN (r = 0.892, p < 0.01) and TP (r = 0.766, p < 0.01).
There are extremely significant differences in wavelength band of 600–680 nm, with P < 0.01.
In duodenum, the expression level of NGF protein was highly significantly higher at 7 days of age than at 20, 55 and 70 days of age ( P < 0.01), and at 20 days of age than at 55 days of age ( P < 0.001), and at 40 days of age, the expression level of NGF protein was highly significant higher than at 20, 55 and 70 days of age ( P < 0.001), and was significantly higher than at 7 days of age ( P < 0.05) and 70 days of age day-old expression levels were highly significantly higher than 20 and 55 days-old ( P < 0.01).
Over the longer-term period of 2000–2020, there is an increasing trend in flooded area (with an MK test of P < 0. 01), based on the JRC Global Surface Water dataset (Fig. 3 c).
Notably, changes in the Percentage of Landscape (PLAND) were highly significant across all towns ( p < 0.01), affirming consistent expansion in built-up area.
The significance test shows that A, C, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 have highly significant effects on SPP yield ( P < 0.01), while the other terms have insignificant effects.
The significance levels were reported as significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
This difference was significant at the highest dose (p < 0.01) and there was also a significant trend of increased bursa-somatic index with increasing dose (post-test for linear trend, p < 0.01).
Statistical analysis showed highly significant (P < 0.01) differences in the causes of burn.
On the other hand, we found a positive trend of dog population immunization from 2011–2018 (p = 0.01 and tau = 0.71).
The effects of irrigation treatments and nitrogen doses on ADF, NDF, ADL, crude fiber, crude ash and crude protein contents were found to be highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01).
Data revealed highly significant difference between the three groups in most of the parameters at p ≤ 0.01; where the obese women with MetS had the highest values.
Two groups were compared using Tukey’s procedure; differences were deemed statistically significant if * P < 0.05 and highly significant if ** P < 0.01.
The cultivar × allantoin interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
The IR net in some areas of the KP exhibited an increasing trend during these years, with a trend slope of 0–1.5 mm a −1 and a highly significant change (p < 0.01).
SOC stocks showed highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) with elevation, mean temperature, mean summer temperature, slope, length of the thermal growing season, and east–west slope aspect.
Among the accessions, highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) were found for almost all the traits excluding fifty percent flowering date, seed length, seed width.
However, a more detailed investigation revealed that the characteristics demonstrated a highly significant inverse relationship (Spearman’s ρ = − 0.93; p < 0.01): the lower C the higher L .
The DCF fluorescence intensity from the bacterial sample treated with andro-AgNPs at 1xMBC and 4xMBC concentration are clearly significantly higher than untreated control ( p < 0.01) within 30 min of incubation (Fig. 6 c, d).
Except for the mid diameter and plant height traits, there were highly significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) between the environments and the interaction of genotype and environment.
Treatment with dsAPL1C may incur a slightly significant survival cost (p = 0.01, Cox HR = 1.3, 99% CI 0.9–1.7; Table 2 and Fig. 6 A).
The results showed that the relationship between each vegetation index and the LAI was extremely significant (P < 0.01).
The Pearson’s correlation between final concentrations of Ni in soil compared to Ni in tomatoes is highly significant (r = 0.83 P < 0.01).