The model likelihood ratio chi-square statistic of 604.969 was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The logarithmic relationships between lake size and WST are highly significant during spring, summer, and autumn ( p < 0.001) and exhibit strong explanatory power (R2 up to 0.74), whereas this relationship is much less significant for winter values, as indicated by markedly lower R2 values and reduced statistical significance.
A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of anatomical site on intercalated duct diameter (F(5, 54) = 409.4, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.974).
Differences were considered extremely significant when ***P < 0.001.
When two extreme outlier values were excluded from the analysis, the interaction was highly significant [F(1.1, 6.8) = 25.3, p = 0.001].
A logistic regression model demonstrated a highly significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the coefficient of concordance and SD-OCT imaging.
There was no significant main effect of lime or pasture type on the P concentration in herbage, however, both lime × year and pasture × year interactions were highly significant ( P < 0.001) due to the strong year effect (Table 2 ).
Genetic subdivision was highly significant between regions ( F CT = 0.882, P < 0.001 for mtCOI; F CT = 0.713, P < 0.001 for nrITS), indicating a high level of geographical population structure.
These reductions were highly significant compared to control ( p < 0.001) for both methods.
A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).
All the path coefficients were highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that all hypothesized relationships between constructs were supported.
The effect of trap model was highly significant (χ 2 = 50.6, df = 3, P > 0.001), whereas population of origin (χ 2 = 4.02, df = 3, P = 0.26), sex (z = −1.616, P = 0.106) and aquaria identity (z = 0.34, p = 0.73) were not.
Similarly, USPIO-enhanced MRI results showed a highly significant main effect of Group on both the maximum T2 change value (F(1, 76) = 22178, p < 0.001) and rate (F(1, 76) = 22076, p < 0.001), with T1DM rabbits exhibiting substantially higher values than controls (Fig. 1 c-e).
The differences were considered significant for *P < 0.05, and highly significant for **P < 0.01 and extremely significant for ***P < 0.001 28 .
The inability to undertake a baseline power analysis decreases the evaluation of type 1 and type 2 statistical errors, but the relatively large numbers of subjects and also the very highly significant values found (p < 0.001) would make the chance of such errors very small.
Differences in maximum length distributions were highly significant among matrices (KW, H = 163.5, p < 0.001).
The main effects are all highly significant: dose (F = 704.450), time (F = 602.805), and extracts (F = 109.872) strongly influence the biological response ( p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the immunohistochemical analysis of CHOP showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase in the expression of this protein in the liver samples of the BDL group (37.5% moderate , 62.5% strong ) as compared to the sham-operated rats.
The fixed effect of the year variable was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) across all four cereal crops (Table 3 ), indicating a consistent upward trend in yields due to non-climatic influences for 1995–2018 period.
At 20 μg MSC-EVs, proliferation increased 1.5-fold (p < 0.05), and highly significant changes (p < 0.001) were observed at 40 to 100 μg compared to the untreated control (Fig. 3A ).
= 0.297 and is statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).
schimperi R., leaf size had a highly significant impact on the response ( F = 58.91 , p = 0.001 ), whereas extraction time had no significant effect ( p = 0.067 ).
Among the different NGs, we found an increasing trend with the period (P < 0.001 T1 vs .
There was a highly significant correlation between Digit RAN and reading fluency (r = −0.782, P < 0.001; Fig. 1b ).
This yielded a modest, but highly significant switch effect, F (1,19) = 40.7, p < 0.001, but no effect of task, F (1,19) = 0.03, p = 0.86, and only a marginal task × switch interaction, F (1,19) = 3.33, p = 0.08.