When metabolic obesity phenotypes were included into the model (model 2), this association was attenuated but still highly significant ( P < 0.001), which demonstrated that VAI was associated with hyperuricemia independent of metabolic obesity phenotype and regardless of criteria.
Excerpts
In females, a decreasing trend was seen throughout the lifespan, with values reaching up to 76.0% of the initial peak value (p < 0.001).
Trade-offs and synergies between ESs There is a similarity in the trade-offs and synergies between ESs at the county and sub-watershed scales, with most ESs showing a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001).
Additionally, for the 10 years old trees, there was a highly significant difference ( p ≤ 0.001) in EAB under FW irrigation (Fig. 3 ).
A highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in the LDH release is observed in groups treated with 10 μg/mL FU-HfO 2 and PEG-HfO 2 with a somewhat significant ( P < 0.01) increase in those treated with 10 μg/mL HfO 2 and 5 μg/mL PEG-HfO 2 .
The difference between means is significant if p value < 0.05 (*), very significant if p value < 0.01 (**), extremely significant if p value < 0.001 (***) or if p value < 0.0001 (****).
Similarly, Mix 24 (mean = 77.17 MPa) demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) compared to Mix 1 (mean = 52.40 MPa).
Creatinine and uric acid levels showed a decreasing trend ( P < 0.001, Table 1 ), while the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) showed a modest elevation across tertiles ( P = 0.014, Table 1 ).
Consistent with other studies 36 , 37 , floral area was a highly significant predictor variable in the visitor abundance model ( P < 0.001).
Results Reliability analysis Intra-class correlations for the different digit lengths varied between 0.94 and 0.97 and were highly significant (all p < 0.001).
Wearing a glove leads to a highly significant increase of force reduction from 61.6 N/s in the baseline condition to 89.5 N/s in the glove condition (PostHoc: t (21) = − 6.8, p < 0.001, d = − 1.5, BF 10 > 100).
Similarly, MMSE scores declined across the diagnostic spectrum, with all between-group comparisons remaining highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The overall regression model was highly significant according to ANOVA (p < 0.001), and the lack-of-fit test was non-significant (p > 0.05), confirming that the quadratic model adequately described the experimental data.
For the hypothesis that the dose reduction was larger than 33.3% compared to a full heart scan, we employed the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; the tests indicated that the reduction was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Out of the thirteen, three operons had highly significant enrichment of hits ( p < 0.001).
For native richness, abundance, functional dispersion, and native phylogenetic diversity, Alien Impact x was positive in richer plots and negative in limited plots, with soil resources having highly significant effects ( F = 23.08, p < 0.001; F = 9.30, p < 0.001; F = 3.75, p < 0.001; F = 24.21, p < 0.001, respectively).
The prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism exhibited an increasing trend as UIC and UI/Cr levels increased (UIC: χ 2 = 40.470, p < 0.001; UI/Cr: χ 2 = 161.513, p < 0.001).
Indeed, for NH 4 + -N and total organic N, all individual treatments, all two-way interactions and the three-way interaction were highly significant ( P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 2 ).
The origin of the near-significant three-way interaction from the overall analysis was therefore, the dominant data, in which the significant main effect of modality F(2,44) = 10.690), p = 0.001 was modulated by a near-significant interaction with experiment F(2,44) = 8.169), p = 0.07.
In contrast to this prediction, ANCOVA (α = 0.05) revealed a highly significant decrease in DSD of neurons from female, compared to male mice (F = 14.838, DF = 1, p < 0.001) in A1, A2, V1, V2 and TeA.
Although EET did not influence the ratio of CD163+ to total M2 macrophages, it resulted in a highly significant increase in M2c macrophages per fiber (P < 0.001; Fig. 5B ).
For both model variants, the effect of contrast was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the effect of luminance was non-significant ( p > 0.285).
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the HMGB-1 and control groups in the ratio of regenerated bone volume ( p < 0.001), while a significant difference was also detected between the HMGB-1 and rhBMP-2 groups ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 3 A).
Gait speed had a moderately significant correlation with JOA score at the final follow-up (r = 0.4, P < 0.001).
Similarly, the Bartlett’s test of sphericity, which provides a measure of the statistical probability that the correlation matrix has significant correlations among some of its components, was highly significant (χ^2 (21) = 30619.604 ( p < 0.001)), thereby confirming that the variables share common variance and are appropriate for factor extraction.