Excerpts

As expected, age was a highly significant predictor, positively associated with severe disease ( p < 0.001).

All correlation coefficients were highly significant ( p < 0.001, Table 5 ).

During the first two weeks, the differences in body weight and food intake were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), with mean body weights of 1780.57 ± 68.5 for Group I and 1628.57 ± 45.7 for Group II.

PDT treatment led to a highly significant size ( P < 0.001) reduction of the mucosal lesion starting from 14 days after PDT (day 28; Fig. 2a,c ) that correlated with a significant improvement of the ABSIS I score ( P < 0.05) at days 42 and 56 (Fig. 2b ).

A significant difference in the evaluation of the individual diameters could be observed in all directions with a highly significant difference in AP and CC direction (p < 0.001) and a very significant result in ML direction (p = 0.008).

oleracea in reducing HeLa cell viability, with highly significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001) and a very large effect size.

Finally, the distribution of the mean MIs among survivors and those who died revealed a highly significant difference by the Kruskal–Wallis test (H = 6351.263; GL = 1; p-value < 0.001) (Fig. 5 ).

An increasing trend in prevalence of liver injury (elevated ALT) was observed among the three groups (chi-square for trend P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3B ).

*** indicates a highly significant difference at P ≤ 0.001.

The TDS was significantly lower in protected plots, but the differences in TDS among treatments, varieties and their interactions were highly significant ( P < 0.001) during both cropping seasons.

The performance of BPL in modeling the beta DTAR and its parameter ranges Regarding the beta-diversity scaling of DTAR, the same BPL, utilized for describing the alpha-diversity DTAR as described above, also fits to the beta-diversity DTAR of the 32-healthy cohort dataset extremely significant with all p- values < 0.001 for 250 tested models.

It decreased significantly between P1 and P2-P4; with GAG content at P1 approximately double that of P2 ( p = 0.004 NRX, p = 0.013 HYP) and highly significant when compared to P3 and P4 (all p < 0.001).

The analysis of variance (Table 3 ) showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) between accessions in all assessed quantitative agronomic characteristics.

Relationship between Serum ferritin and demographic, transfusion, chelation characteristics and disease complications There was highly significant positive correlation between serum ferritin and each of age (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and liver iron content (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) and highly significant negative correlation between serum ferritin and each of age of start transfusion (r = −0.56, p < 0.001), frequency of transfusion (r = −0.58, p < 0.001), age of start chelation (r = −0.52, p < 0.001), compliance (r = −0.52, p < 0.001) and cardiac T2* (r = −0.56, p < 0.001) (Figs 1 and 2 ).

There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) enrichment of CSF tracer in the subarachnoid space (SAS) adjacent to the straight gyrus with peak enrichment after 3–6 h (Fig. 1 ; Supplementary Table S1 ).

Analysis of difference waves at the FCz electrode showed highly significant group differences for Novel-Standard comparisons (t(50) = 4.84, p < 0.001), with NH children exhibiting substantially larger amplitudes (M = 14.75 μV, SD = 5.56) compared to CI users (M = 7.34 μV, SD = 5.47), representing a large effect size (d = 1.34).

For MFCC2 with fmax = 12 kHz, there was a highly significant effect of gender (males were higher, p <0.001) and a significant effect of dataset (CLAC values were lower, p <0.05) with no significant effect of age.

However, two interaction terms, puffing temperature-sample moisture and puffing temperature-moisture content were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), indicating the critical role of thermal and moisture dynamics in phenolic retention.

Category-wise change in gingival phenotype/thickness (based on tobacco product) Table 2 demonstrates that the ANOVA for the three groups indicated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

CDH1 showed a highly significant upregulation ( p < 0.001*), which was more pronounced than initially characterized.

Pairwise comparisons of mean values were conducted using Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc test specifically for solution type, nozzle size, and operating pressure, as these factors exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

Negative correlations between temperature and DO were highly significant (p < 0.001), and highly significant positive correlations was found between NH 4 + and DIN (p < 0.001, Fig. 7 ).

Both estimators for α and β are highly significant (p < 0.001) 32 , and the mean pseudo-R 2 is 0.98 for the I p = 4 case and the I p = 10 case.

When analysed using a stratified log rank test, the predatory bacteria provided a highly significant (p < 0.001) protective effect from a lethal challenge of Y. pestis CO92 pGEN-luxCDABE.

Both contrasts were highly significant (t = −5.2 and −6.2, p < 0.001).