The combined effect of the variables as predictors was highly significant (P<0.001), with pseudo-R 2 values ranging from 0.471 to 0.635.
Excerpts
New patients had a 5-year survival rate of 67%, while old patients had a rate of 50%, and this difference was highly significant ( p -value < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
Results MLT improved sperm parameters Exposure to 4-Gy γ-radiation resulted in morphologically aberrant head and tail after 3 and 14 days of irradiation with a highly significant ( P < 0.001) drop in sperm count, motility, and viability (Fig. 1 ) compared to control rats.
Except for flower fresh, dry and ΔFlower weight variables, all species, populations and species * population interactions were very highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) .
The 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality showed a highly significant difference correlating with the stage of CKD ( p < 0.001) (see Supplementary Materials, Table S6 ).
Both models were highly significant and explained about 17% of the variance of PTSS, model 2: adjusted R 2 = .17, F (4, 103) = 6.77, p < .001; model 3: adjusted R 2 = .18, F (5, 102) = 5.43, p < .001.
There was a significant trend that the longer the duration of drug use, the higher the improvement rate relative to 11% with < 30 days of use ( p < 0.001).
A χ 2 test showed that the difference between the subgroups was highly significant (p<0.001).
Another highly significant difference exists for alkaline phosphatase at 0-3 months, between Groups III and IV (with skeletal and hepatic metastases) and all the other groups (P = 0 001).
Comparisons were considered significant when (p< 0.05) and highly significant when (p< 0.001).
Although there is no linear relationship, the effect size (.157) is very large, suggesting this is a highly significant relationship (F(4,238) = 11.08, p < .001***).
The number of days between appointment scheduling and occurrence (lag days) remained highly significant ( P < .001) after controlling for all other factors in the model, underscoring its impact on appointment adherence.
Results: Group A ( Satvavajaya + placebo) with counseling showed statistically highly significant result ( P < 0.001) in verbal retention for similar pair, verbal retention for dissimilar pair and visual immediate tests; while Group B ( Shankhapushpi tablets) showed significant result ( P < 0.01) in auditory delayed, visual delayed, auditory recognition and visual recognition tests.
Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and Modified PMS Scale, analysing pre - and post-intervention symptoms through descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and chi-square tests. The intervention significantly reduced PMS severity, with mild PMS cases increasing from 48 (20.78%) to 166 (71.86%) post-intervention. Paired t-tests revealed a highly significant mean difference in PMS scores (T = 12.251, p < 0.001).
Both contrasts were highly significant (t = −5.2 and −6.2, p < 0.001).
Three levels of significance were used to define significance: significant at p < 0.05, very significant at p < 0.01, and highly significant at p < 0.001.
Furthermore, there was a highly significant difference in V T * between the isoflurane condition and the ket/dex condition ( p < 0.001) in both frontal cortex and hippocampus.
We found highly significant difference between CRP groups in the occurrence of the MetS components ( p < 0.001), hypertension ( p < 0.001), hypertriglyceridemia ( p < 0.001), and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ( p = 0.001), waist circumference ( p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) z -score ( p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose ( p < 0.001), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance ( p < 0.001), respectively.
Improvement noticed in QDNOS score was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The extracts olive biophenols showed markedly significant protection of SH-SY5Y cells at all concentrations tested ( p < 0.001) against l -DOPA induced toxicity.
Contrariwise, biostimulant treatments had a highly significant effect ( p -value ≤ 0.001) on tomato productive and qualitative traits.
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) A highly significant treatment effect was found on the CGI scale, with a benefit of − 0.63 (− 0.84; − 0.47; p < 0.001, Suppl. 9.2.1) compared with the placebo, confirmed by the results from the SMM model − 0.67 (− 0.97; − 0.36, p < 0.001, Suppl. 9.3, Fig. 1 ), and found to be homogeneous among studies.
The odds of self-reported sleep disturbances were increased across all preventive measures, and most of the findings are highly significant ( p < 0.001).
All those differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
There was a highly significant difference (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.001) between these two groups with “within” distances being smaller than “between” distances ( Figure 3(A–B) ). 3.5.