Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Eight families exhibit a highly significant distribution ( p < 0.001): ‘Biofilm formation’, ‘Carbohydrate metabolic process’, ‘Cell adhesion’, ‘Cell cycle’, ‘Cytoskeleton organization’, ‘Generation of precursor metabolites and energy’, ‘Translation’, and ‘Vitamin metabolic process’ ( Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of total extractable inositol phosphates in the ileal digesta by two-way ANOVA showed no significant effect of TiO 2 on the recovery of mixed inositol phosphates ( F 1 , 43 = 0.71, p = 0.4), whereas dietary treatment by way of inclusion of phytase was highly significant ( F 3 , 43 = 93.51, p < 0.001).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
xyvitamin D and inflammatory marker levels Results NeP component 32 (21 [20.6%]; clearly NeP and 11 [10.8%]; mixed NeP) was present in patients with AS Compared to those without NeP, they had significantly higher VAS and BASDAI scores (p=0.022 and 0.003, respectively) In addition, there was a highly significant difference of frequency of fibromyalgia between patients with and without NeP (50.0% vs 5.7%, p<0.001) Vitamin D status and medication use were comparable for patients with and without NeP Logistic regression analysis revealed that only fibromyalgia was a significant predictor of NeP Conclusion This stud
nominally significantP = 1.00 × 10 −30.0× alphagold
In analyses of biomarker trends for ordinal categories of TSLB, 18 biomarkers were nominally significant, and CD20 ( P = 1.00 × 10 −3 ), CTLA4 ( P = 1.00 × 10 −3 ), PD-1 ( P = 1.00 × 10 −3 ), PR ( P = 1.00 × 10 −4 ), and PTEN ( P = 5.00 × 10 −4 ) remained significant after Bonferroni correction ( Table S6 ).
Postpartum breast cancer: evidence for a distinct phenotype.
J Natl Cancer Inst · 2026 · PMC13155230
an increasing trendp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
a decreasing trendp = 0.02880.6× alphagold
Regarding SD clusters, we found an increasing trend in ORx and OSRx average within 60 min just before SD clusters, as seen in the positive slopes derived from the fitted linear mixed-effects model (0.0013 [ p = 0.001] for ORx and 0.0009 [ p = 0.0001] for OSRx, respectively; Table 2 ) We also found a decreasing trend in ORx within 60 min just after SD clusters (− 0.0008, p = 0.0288) but no significant trend in OSRx post-SD clusters.