Excerpts

This increase was highly significant, for example, at L3 ( p = 0.001 vs. negative control) ( Figure 13 ).

This increasing trend is highly significant with p -value < 0.001 (Table 2 ) 25 .

BC comp ) was always highly significant ( p < 0.001 ).

Following covariation for age alone on the ‘use of strategies to aid memory’ measure, there was a highly significant effect of GROUP ( F [2,444] = 29.0, p < 0.001, corrected p < 0.1), no significant effect of SEX ( F [1,444] = 3.32, p = 0.07), and no GROUP × SEX interaction ( F [2,444] = 0.042, p = 0.96).

At 1 month and 3 months of rehabilitation, the ADL scores of the patients in the 24 h rehabilitation group were 66.95 ± 4.707 and 96.55 ± 2.873, respectively, which were higher than those in the 72 h rehabilitation group (52.95 ± 6.725 and 84.46 ± 6.971), and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

The results of the multiple logistic regression analyses indicated a highly significant correlation between extinction and O 2 -carrying capacity ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 A; Tables S3–S9 ).

Moderate but highly significant correlations were observed between PVR and the incidence of AAo dilatation (Spearman’s rho = 0.444; p < 0.001) and between PVR and higher AAo diameter indexed to BSA (Spearman’s rho = 0.371; p < 0.001).

A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the performance of preoperative NRI and dSMI in mortality prediction was quite significant (AUC: 0.63, P < 0.001) and the combination of clinical factors enhanced the predictive accuracy to the AUC of 0.90 ( P < 0.001).

After treatment with 1 mg/mL HEA, the relative PxAdoR mRNA level showed a highly significant, almost 4.3-fold ( P < 0.001) increase compared to the control ( Table 3 ).

The Spearman-Rho test demonstrated that correlation between all methods used for the determination of free hemoglobin was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The association between visit to faith healer after visiting RMP and belief in faith healer was highly significant statistically (p<0.001).

However, MK-801 in these same doses produced highly significant ( P < 0.001) reductions in the rate of tumor growth, to almost 60% that of controls, over the course of the study ( Figure 5b ).

In AS patients, the occurrence of ANS shows an increasing trend with age (r = 0.233, P = 0.001).

As expected, the repeated measures ANOVA showed a highly significant main effect for the network variable ( p < 0.001), indicating significant differences of CMRGlc values in the individual networks.

Results Behaviour There was a highly significant effect of CO 2 treatment on percent reduction in feeding strikes following the addition of the alarm odour ( t 160 = −3.69, P < 0.001, Fig. 1 ).

Kaplan–Meier curves showed a clear trend between ALBI quartiles ( P < .001).

We obtained highly significant ( P <0.001) genotypic differences in control and stress conditions for the three traits (root length, biomass, and diameter).

As shown in Table 2 , the mean differences in sBP and dBP before and after PP among responders were highly significant, with a decrease from 130 ± 9.8 to 121 ± 10.2 mmHg (sBP), with a mean drop of 9 mmHg ( P < .001), and a decrease from 79 ± 5.8 to 76 ± 7.5 mmHg (dBP), with a mean drop of 3 mmHg ( P < .001).

Overall, the vSTR model was highly significant [ Figure 2 ; F (8,17) = 10.39; P < 0.001; adjusted R 2 adjusted = 0.75], such that age [ β = −0.29 t (17) = −2.30; P < 0.05], intertemporal preference [log(k): β = −0.31 t (17) = 2.14; P < 0.05], reward sensitivity [ β = 0.51 t (17) = 4.35; P < 0.001], right vSTR–vmPFC connectivity [ β = 0.58 t (17) = 3.96; P < 0.001] and right vSTR–dlPFC connectivity [ β = −0.33 t (17) = −2.15; P < 0.05] were all associated with MTE.

The minimal model for fur and skin, which included age categories 1–3 as a factor, explained 42.74% ( p < 0.001) and 22.23% ( p < 0.05) of data variability, respectively, with a highly significant difference found between age groups 1 and 3 ( p < 0.001) and no difference between groups 1 and 2 (Fig. 2a, b ).

This showed that there were highly significant differences between the community and the ASD group ( U = 1650.0, Z = −7.73, P < 0.001) as well as between the community and the clinical groups ( U = 4905.0, Z = −7.77, P < 0.001).

Differences are considered significant if P < 0.05 (denoted with *) and highly significant if P < 0.001 (denoted with **).

Within-subjects effects: The effect of life epoch was highly significant (F(3, 261) = 23886.217, P < 0.001).

An increasing trend in the quantity of average vaping was found over time ( BF (14, 130.955) = 0.954 p < 0.001), although the Bf < 3 ( Table 1 ).

At F21, the CIf/CIm difference was also highly significant for both high and unselected lines ( P <0.001) whereas it was reduced in the low discrimination lines ( P <0.05).