Crucially, Sleep Quality exhibited a strong and highly significant total effect on SRH (est = 0.383, p < 0.001). 4.
Excerpts
Figure 2 summarizes the abovementioned results, and the prevalence of OaPV1, OaPV2 and OaPV3 was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) compared to OaPV4 prevalence.
This apparent divergence of r 2 values between leaves (including Equisetum telmateia branches) and stems (including woody samples) was highly significant ( P < 0.001; independent samples Mann–Whitney test).
The correlation between BED and psychiatric disorders was highly significant ( p <0.001) for all psychiatric disorders (Table 4 ).
Previously, we had found that for an OR with a typical expression frequency (~0.1%) and an effect size of ~2-fold, statistically 12 OE sections taken from four different animals were sufficient to find a highly significant difference (p < 0.001; two-tailed paired t test).
Finally, it should be noted that while the correlation between ‘general performance quality’ and ‘study grades/output’ was highly significant ( r = 0.709, p < 0.001), their correlations with ‘interactions with other students’ or ‘contact with teachers’ were not significant.
The frequency of cancer in pure DM (21%) compared with all patients with OM (n = 0/66, 0%) was statistically highly significant (p = 0.001, OR 37.5, 95%CI 1.98 to 709 by 2-tailed Fisher exact test).
The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant ( P <0.001).
The chi-square test revealed a highly significant deviation between the observed and expected breakpoint distributions (χ 2 (1, N = 31) = 15.80, P < 0.001), leading us to reject the null hypothesis and concluding that intron 5 is a breakpoint hotspot region ( Table 2 ).
It was highly significant ( P <0.001) in control after 8 days of stress (Figure 3 ).
A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).
However, in Tunisian women there was also a significant trend to decrease the MS risk from ICE2 to ICE5 (p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis confirmed that these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001 ), highlighting the potent pro-apoptotic capacity of both U. dioica extracts, particularly HE, across multiple cell lines.
A Danish study including 28,000 people followed up over 14 years reported, in the men only, a highly significant ( P = 0.001) direct association with NMSC for vigorous activity vs low activity, with a rate ratio of 1.72 (95% CI 1.23–2.40) [ 52 ].
Chi-square analysis confirmed a highly significant association between cytology category and HPV mRNA status (χ 2 = 1296.26, df = 4, p < 0.001). 3.5.2.
Subgroup analyses by sex showed that the associations of CSD with GDS score became stronger with a significant trend (P < 0.001) in women.
In the parsimonious model, Module effect remained highly significant (p<0.001), and Item also showed a significant main effect (p<0.001), indicating different average levels across items but no differences in their pattern of change.
Our study highlighted that there was a highly significant association between good knowledge and good attitude ( P < 0.001), and also, it was seen that participants with good practice also had good attitude which was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
FLT4 and KDR show highly significant association to one of the analysed groups (FLT4: p=0.001; KDR: p=0.006).
Differences between groups of * P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, ** P < 0.01 were considered highly significant. *** P < 0.001 were considered very highly significant.
PERMANOVA was highly significant ( P = 0.001) for both species, as is beta dispersion ( A. flavipes: F 1 = 25.14, P = 0.001; A. barbilabris: F 1 = 18.18, P = 0.001).
All variables showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) among studied samples.
Under these conditions, we observed highly significant ( p < 0.001) and elevated cellulase activity in gna-1 Q204L and gna-2 Q205L strains and the Δ rgs-1 mutant.
This will have the effect of p-value estimates being a little smaller than they should be – hence our emphasis on effect sizes, although the large size of the data implies that most if not all statistical results are highly significant ( i.e. , p < 0.001).
Pooled data from three independent experiments revealed highly significant inhibition (p<0.001) as measured by slope, max-min and AUC analysis ( Figure 4C-E ).