Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Result Phenotypic assessment The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among the genotypes effects, salinity treatments, and their interactions (genotype × treatment interaction (Gen × Trt)) for germination-related traits across the four NaCl treatment levels (0, 100, 150 and 200 mM).
highly significantP =0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data from six animals revealed mean peak MRI signal changes of 5.3±0.9% during wtCGRP injection, compared with changes of 1.2±0.1% during injection of aCSF alone; the difference between wtCGRP and vehicle was highly significant ( t -test P =0.001).
Molecular imaging with engineered physiology.
Nat Commun · 2016 · PMC5146284
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The trend toward lower 28-day mortality at a higher Cr/CysC ratio was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ). 3.2 Association between Cr/CysC ratio and 28-day mortality After performing univariate Cox regression analyses ( Supplementary Table S4 ), we constructed six multivariable Cox regression models to assess the relationship between the Cr/CysC ratio and 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similar to the ERG data, the central foveal thickness and mean retinal thickness in the right and left eyes of patients showed highly significant correlations (r 2 = 0.45, p < 0.001; and r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.001, respectively), and we therefore used only the SD-OCT data obtained from the right eye of all subjects for further analysis.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) across the genotypes (G) and genotype × year (G × Y) interactions but no significant differences between the two years (Y) ( Table 1 ). 3.3 Resequencing of sweet potato genotype resources and SNP calling Sequencing was performed after constructing a GBS library of the 96 genotypes.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A mixed model regression across both stimulus types (pattern, flash) collapsed across color showed a highly significant group X stimulus-type interaction (F 1,102 = 23.9, p < 0.001, d = 0.97) ( Figure 1C ) consistent with differential magnocellular vs. parvocellular dysfunction.