Recruitment was stopped early after a recommendation from the data and safety monitoring committee based on a highly significant between-group difference (p<0.001) in terms of incidence of the primary endpoint favouring preventive PCI.
Excerpts
Subsequently uterine abnormalities accounted for 5.7% of cases and were highly significant (p = 0.001).
With a mIoU of 39.66% (± 0.91) versus 25.04% (± 1.81) for the baseline, the observed improvement is highly significant ( p< 0.001).
ANCOVA with PGY level and baseline SSI-BS as covariates confirmed the group effect remained highly significant (F = 28.4, p < 0.001); neither covariate was significant ( p > 0.20).
Moreover, the 25-day experimental subgroup demonstrated a highly significant decrease in the mean area percentage of αSMA immunopositivity compared with the control group ( P < 0.001) (Table 3 ; Fig. 5 ).
Intubation time was shorter and the use of on-demand sedation/analgesia was less for two-person compared to one-person technique - both comparisons highly significant (p < 0.001) (table 2 ).
Moreover, in terms of the relation between the QOL and satisfaction after surgery, it was very highly significant as the P value < 0.001 [ Table 5 ].
The full model was highly significant when compared with the null model ( θ = 341.69, d.f. = 29, p -value < 0.001).
A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed a highly significant difference ( p ‐value ≤ .001, D ‐value 0.28) between the biomod2 oak probability rasters “filtered by area” and “filtered by area and elevation.” Figure 4 shows that forcing pixels into the elevation distribution of the NFI survey sample squares caused a low probability tail in the distribution compared with the area‐only filter.
In this study there was a highly significant (p<0.001) rebound increase in urinary neopterin and total neopterin up to 28 days following this post-surgical dip, peaking at day 3 and 14 for hips and knees respectively.
Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that these differences were highly significant ( F (2, 287) = 3961.048; p < 0.001; e 2 = 0.932) (Figure 3 ).
The C 4 grasses measured here also showed a highly significant variation in stomatal traits such as SR and SD ada ( P < 0.001; Tables 1 , S2 ).
While the absolute reductions (2.3 and 4.6% points) are smaller, they remain highly significant ( p < 0.001).
One-way ANOVAs found highly significant differences between frontal, non-frontal and control participants for S fluency and Hayling suppression errors [ F (2,238) = 25.319; P < 0.001; F (2,192) = 21.266; P < 0.001, respectively].
The analysis also showed that these effects were interdependent: the interaction between the two factors was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and blocking UV decreased attack rates in sp items (with more eyespots) but increased attack rates in wt items (with fewer eyespots) ( Fig. 3 ).
Both compounds showed statistically significant effects at doses of 4 and 20 mg/kg, with IRPN demonstrating highly significant differences (** p < 0.001 and *** p < 0.001 vs. negative control) (Figure 4A ), and IRPL showing similar results (** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 vs. negative control) (Figure 4B ).
Repeated‐measures analysis results represented in Table 2 showed a highly significant decline in pain scores over time in both arms (time effect P < 0.001), with mean VAS falling from 4.33 ± 0.97 to 2.68 ± 0.81 to 1.53 ± 0.68 in the bupivacaine group and from 4.85 ± 1.05 to 3.16 ± 0.95 to 1.84 ± 0.71 in controls.
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001, two-tail t-Test; at 5% level of significance) was observed later after 36 h of incubation in Kuroshio and STG samples (Table 2 ).
On the other, feeding caused highly significant lethal effects (>70%) on the two lepidopteran species ( H. armigera : t = −25.98; df = 11; P < 0.001; L. dispar : t = −30.94; df = 11; P < 0.001), a moderate effect (58.3%) on M. domestica ( t = −20.63; df = 11; P < 0.001) and just a slight effect (21.7%) on C. capitata ( t = −8.37; df = 11; P < 0.
Statistically significant results were denoted by a value of P < 0.05, while the results were considered highly significant when value of P < 0.001 was obtained.
A highly significant association was found between PV training and PV knowledge ( P < 0.001).
Among these, haplotype variation produced a highly significant phenotypic difference ( p < 0.001) between the H001 and H002 haplogroups (Fig. 5 B).
In contrast to the highly significant ( P < 0.001) ANO1 current reduction (Fig. 4a ), SR Ca 2+ release was indistinguishable ( P > 0.05) from control scrambled siRNA expressing myotubes (Fig. 4b ), indicating that the observed ANO1 current reduction cannot be attributed to putative siRNA off-target effects hampering SR Ca 2+ release.
RESULTS The results of the present experiment revealed highly significant ( P <0.001) scolicidal effects against protoscolices of E. granulosus for all of the various concentrations of S. persica ethanolic extract, compared to the control results, both within the same period of time and different periods as shown in Table 1 .
The highly significant model ( p < 0.001) and high R 2 values ( R 2 = 0.9237, adjusted- R 2 = 0.9075) indicate a strong correlation between the variables and the response.