Free Throw Performance A mixed-design ANOVA [(3 groups × 2 time points)] with repeated measures on the second factor (see Figure 6 ) revealed: (i) a highly significant main effect of time on shooting performance [F(1, 52) = 27.34, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.34], (ii) a non-significant main effect of group [F(2, 52) = 0.35, p = 0.7, η 2 p = 0.02], and (iii) a significant interaction effect between group and time [F(2, 52) = 4.32, p < 0.05, η 2 p = 0.14].
Excerpts
We found that interobserver agreement was substantial in early emphysema diagnosis; highly significant ( p <0.001) time-trends in both emphysema presence and grading were found (higher prevalence and grade of emphysema in late scans).
This difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that patients with CKD were exposed to greater nitrosative stress (Table 4 ).
Overall, the regression model was highly significant [ F (1, 48) = 55.39, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.53] and yielded a significant coefficient for trial (β = 0.02, t = 7.44, p < 0.001), which indicates that the difference across the two conditions increased logarithmically over time.
Follow-up of this (occasion × trial type) interaction showed no effect of trial type or block at baseline ( p values >0.20) but a highly significant main effect of trial type [ F (1,14) = 17.54, p = 0.001, ηρ 2 = 0.56], showing much faster RTs during pattern trials than random trials over the entire experiment (random trials: mean = 0.33 s, SEM = 0.39; pattern trials: mean = 0.298 s, SEM = 0.034) at follow-up in this group (Table 3 ).
The mean change was highly significant between NSO and placebo ( P < .001).
Quantification of signal intensities demonstrated highly significant reductions in tracer binding in both the kidney (−50%, p < 0.001) and pancreas (−32%, p < 0.001) of KO animals, indicating that a large proportion of the [ 18 F]TAAR1-2203 signal in these peripheral organs is attributable to specific TAAR1-mediated binding.
The final model was highly significant ( F = 50.132, p < 0.001).
The total indirect effect was highly significant (β = .32; p < .001), while there was no significant direct effect from CM to MD symptoms anymore in the total model (β = .002, p = .957).
Offset turned out to be highly significant, F(1,8) = 26.17, p < .001, with SDs of offset judgments being about twice the SDs of onset judgments ( SD Onset = 26.9 ms; SD Offset = 45 ms).
Statistical analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference among treatments (χ 2 (4) = 77.7, p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ).
This tendency was also highly significant ( p < 0.001).
As shown in Table 2 and Table 3 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the quadratic model adequately described the experimental data.
Thus, we observed weak enrichment of strain-specific variants at sex-biased CREs when considering the full eQTL regions, but found a highly significant, 2.5-fold enrichment within intra-TAD intervals (p<0.001 for intra-TAD interval variants vs p = 0.278 genome-wide).
The standard drug, indomethacin (INDO, 10 mg/kg, i.p.), showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory activity in both inflammatory tests ( Table 4 ).
Piauí was the unique state with a decreasing trend in the period (APC = − 22.6%; P < 0.001) (Table 1 ).
Effects of Different Cover Crop Management Models on Citrus Traits Regarding leaf physiological traits, both Cl and N content exhibited highly significant responses to the treatments ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 A,B).
On the contrary, in the EXP (c) , MCT procedure and CI (95%) simultaneous comparison showed a highly significant difference for overall comparison ( Q = 3.09; p < 0.001) and for pairwise contrasts (results reported in Table 4 and Fig. 2 ).
All interactions (V × t2, V × t2 2 , V 2 × t2, V 2 × t2 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ), with emphasis on the V × t2 2 interaction ( F = 34112.14) and V 2 × t2 2 interaction ( F = 16,285.38).
Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).
For the two results, we find a highly significant spatial (grid space) correlation, with Pearson's r -test correlation coefficient 2 , r = 0.99 [99.9%CI, p < 0.001] showing that differences are generally small.
A highly significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of mean HbA1c levels ( P = 0.001), as shown in Figure 1 .
The differences between finger and wrist were highly significant ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test, for all wavelengths and sensors), confirming the finger as the most reliable site and the wrist as the most challenging location for reflective-mode PPG acquisition.
There was only a small decrease in the magnitude of the association between the FPDS and the mean WDDS-10 (from β = 0.10 to β = 0.09), but the association remained highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 3 , B models).
As for the direct effect of sex on decomposition use, it was highly significant before the mediator was entered in the model ( p < .001); once the mediator was added, the direct effect decreased but remained significant ( p = .02), indicating partial mediation (see Figure 1 A).