Vesicular release from astrocytes (DOX treatment) was the main factor determining nodal gap length across all conditions, with a highly significant difference of ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in 2 h HPF intake in the 4 groups of rats ( F (3, 26) = 19.32; P < 0.001).
Inter- and intra-observer variability for CT measured PA/AA-ratio A strong and statistically highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) inter- and intra-observer correlation was found.
However, the table also shows that the differences in quality of life on the 10 th day were highly significant for all domains (with P < 0.001 for domains 1, 2 and 4 and P = 0.03 for domain 3) and overall QOL ( P < 0.001).
Results: Absolute and relative EZ reflectivity showed highly significant increases at postoperative 12 months compared to 1 month (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively).
4 ). The mean bone volume of the augmented site was 372.2 ± 179.4 mm 3 immediately post-operatively (T1) and 230.2 ± 185.7 mm 3 after 12 months (T2), leading to an extent of total resorption relative to the original bone volume of 43.7% ± 19.0%, being highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Figs. 4 and 5 ).
There was a highly significant and positive correlation between dose and baseline K-ARS scores (r=0.275, p=0.001) and also a positive correlation between dose and endpoint K-ARS scores (r=0.365, p=0.001).
The global RDA model was highly significant ( F = 3.73, p = 0.001), with an adjusted R 2 of 31.23% (Table 2 ).
When the colors were treated as a single AVD category, the trend remained highly significant (χ 2 = 383.41, df = 24, P < 0.001).
There was a highly significant mucosal enhancement ( P <0.001) and significant bowel wall dilatation in patients with NE when compared with the second group ( P =0.002).
Pseudo- P values were calculated as the proportion of simulated bootstrapped datasets; only highly significant positive correlations were used to infer the network (SparCC correlation of >0.6 and P values of <0.001).
The difference in mean association strength between strong and weak conditions was highly significant (t(188) = 16.05, p < .001; Table 1 ).
Statistical analysis based on PC1 scores revealed highly significant differences between Io and It ( p < 0.001), as well as between Io and Ii ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 C).
The correlation study between the SSP and RBS total scores was highly significant (Rho = −0.80 ( p < 0.001)).
All three datasets included both younger and older students, though there were fewer students in the youngest age-group in the 2014 survey compared to the 2010 and 2018 surveys. Trends in HSCL-25 score across survey years Overall, an increase in self-reported psychological distress was observed between each time point from 2010 to 2018 (treating time as a categorical variable) and as an overall trend (treating time as continuous variable) (all p < 0.001).
Those authors showed a tendency of rabbits to look at each other also when located in different cages, and the preference to look towards the subject nearby was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), comparing medians (5.0 and 3.0) (rank sum test).
These differences between the two groups were highly significant (P<0.001).
A P -value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant (*), a P -value of P <0.01 as highly significant (**) and P -values of P <0.001 (***) as extremely significant.
Rates of nerve transection procedures at the LFCN ranged substantially lower, at an annual average of 5% (± 2), and also showed a decreasing trend from 8 ( n = 52) to 3% ( n = 19) ( p < 0.001).
In retention performance, highly significant improvement in memory was noted in all the groups as compared to the acquisition trials ( P < 0.001) whereas only 400 mg/kg dose of Acacia auriculiformis extract (AAE) and rivastigmine group showed significant improvement when compared to control ( P < 0.001).
This study found a highly significant linear increase in the percentage of MetHb in blood as a function of nitrate dose: MetHb (%) = 41.3 × nitrate (g NO 3 ‐ /kg bw per day) + 1.2 (R 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).
However, histopathology results showed a highly significant association (χ2 = 20.892, p < 0.001), with 84.2% of patients with a positive "Amr sign" having confirmed acute appendicitis, compared to 54.3% in the negative group.
faecalis CFU was 14.68, which was highly significant ( P = 0.001) compared to Group I, implying that PAD, used as an adjunct to conventional irrigation with NaOCl, was significantly more effective in removing E. faecalis from the root canals.
When the estimated missing effects were included in the analysis, the global association between adversity and psychosis remained highly significant, k = 45; OR = 2.29 (95% CI = 1.91–2.74), p < .001.