Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP =0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Spindle power for gained ‘cued' words without feedback was higher as compared with gained ‘cued+feedback' words ( P =0.05) and the interaction between the factors feedback (‘cued' versus ‘cued+feedback') and memory consequence (‘gains' versus ‘loss') was highly significant ( F (1,19) =15.31, P =0.001; η 2 =0.32).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This result is supported by previously identified highly significant (p<0.001) positive additive (‘bb’) x additive (‘bb’) effects from a joint scaling test using the MRI x SB22 full-sibling family indicating the presence of homozygous loci with an increase in susceptibility [ 19 ].
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We also found a highly significant relationship between plasma-EV number and peripheral blood neutrophil number ( R 2 = 0.753, P < 0.001) at time of presentation ( Figure 2D ), consistent with a possible role for plasma EVs in neutrophil mobilization post-AMI. 3.4 Human VCAM-1+ plasma EVs are enriched at time of presentation with AM
showed a trendP < 0.0010.0× alpha
In combined analysis, the addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel resulted in a significant improvement in DFS (HR 0.52, P < 0.001) and reduction of death by 39% (OS, HR 0.61, P < 0.001) compared to paclitaxel alone.[ 13 ] The efficacy of concurrent versus sequential administration of trastuzumab showed a trend toward improvement in DFS in the concurrent arm; however, sequential was still better than placebo ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At 1 day of heat stress, genotype (G) had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on photosynthetic rate (Pn), leaf conductance (Gs), transpiration (E), chlorophyll fluorescence traits (YII, NPQ, Fv/Fm), and carotenoid content (Cart), but not on chlorophyll-A (Chl-A), chlorophyll-B (Chl-B), or carotenoid (Cart).
showed a trendp < 0.0010.0× alpha
S2 ) than angry as well as happy or neutral faces, and showed a trend to fixate angry faces more than happy faces (rate: fear vs. anger: χ 2 = 13.69, df = 1, p < 0.001; fear vs. happy χ 2 = 15.92, df = 1, p < 0.001; fear vs. neutral: χ 2 = 20.01, df = 1, p < 0.001, anger vs. happy χ 2 = 3.47, df = 1, p = 0.063; duration: fear vs. anger: χ 2 = 12.09, df = 1, p = 0.001; fear vs. happy χ 2 = 14.46, df = 1, p < 0.001; fear vs. neutral χ 2 = 16.78, df = 1, p < 0.001).