The difference became significant (p<0.05) at day 79 post injection and highly significant past 79 days (p<0.001).
Excerpts
All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Statistical significance was determined based on P values, with * P < 0.05 considered statistically significant, ** P < 0.01 considered highly significant, and *** P < 0.001 considered extremely significant.
The AGT rs5050 variant remained highly significant for both SBP (AC: B = 13.91, 95% CI: 9.63–18.19, p < 0.001; CC: B = 15.18, 95% CI: 6.40–23.95, p < 0.001) as shown in Table 2 , and DBP (AC: B = 10.49, 95% CI: 7.75–13.22, p < 0.001; CC: B = 7.15, 95% CI: 1.55–12.76, p = 0.013).
In addition, there were highly significant centre effects on inattentive symptoms (Q = 88.37, p < .001), hyperactive/impulsive symptoms (Q = 93.53, p < .001), and a significant gender by centre effect for the number of inattention symptoms (Q = 103.8, p < .001) but not for the number of hyperactive/impulsive symptoms.
A moderately significant negative correlation was observed for DF-DLF ( r = -0.58; P < 0.001).
The overall between-group effect was also highly significant, F (3, 20) = 90.502, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.931.
In contrast, TCI usage showed an overall trend over time (P < 0.001), but no significant differences were observed in comparisons between any two specific months.
The results of intergroup comparison using the independent-t-test showed a highly significant (p<0.001) distinction between the control and LLLT groups at different time intervals (baseline and six months after) (Table 1 , Figure 4 ).
Multi-site variety trials with six contrasting spring wheat varieties carried out on organic farms located in three contrasting pedo-climatic zones of the UK also identified very highly significant ( p < 0.001) interactions between site/environment and variety for (i) grain and protein yield, (ii) major yield-determining parameters such as Septoria and yellow rust severity and (iii) processing and nutritional quality parameters [ 57 ] ( Table 6 , Table 7 and Table 8 ).
The differences in the mean number of SCEs per cell between the control and all test variants (solution, dose, and time) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The difference in change detection when paired with easy or hard search was highly significant, t (23) = 12.81, p < 0.001.
However, the bone density in Group III patients was still more than the Group II and III patients which were quite significant ( P < 0.001).
The between‐group difference after intervention was highly significant after adjustment for baseline values, changes in energy, and protein intake ( p < 0.001) (Table 4 ). 3.5.
Seedling emergence percentage and radiation sensitivity classification A significant three-way interaction among genotype, radiation dose, and salt stress was observed for seedling emergence percentage ( p < 0.001), with a highly significant genotype × dose interaction also detected ( p < 0.001; Table 1 ).
Nonetheless, a density histogram of all structures shows an overall trend to a small volume decrease in Sarm1 KO mice (Fig. 3 F, red curve, all structures mean= − 0.98% ± 0.32%, p < 0.001).
The increase was highly significant in the multivariate analysis for both stoves ( p < 0.001).
pelagicus was found within individuals, and highly significant in all cases (F IT = 0.125–0.19, P<0.001).
Bartlett's test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p <·001), indicating that correlations between instruments were sufficiently large for a PCA.
Use of PRF resulted in statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) increased GT at 6 months’ time point as compared to participants treated with CAF without PRF, which indicates clinical and esthetic benefits achieved through the procedure.
The difference in Sr isotope values between samples collected in the Precambrian and samples from the Paleozoic areas is highly significant (MWU-test: p < 0.001).
Phosphate levels decline with increasing body weights in both sexes ( Figure 4A ), as confirmed by mixed effect model ANOVA together with the company, study year and subject, where the likelihood ratio tests for the body weight classes were statistically highly significant (females: chi 2 = 1562.2, df = 7, p < 0.001, males: chi 2 = 4366.3, df = 15, p < 0.001).
AMOVA was used to determine that variation among and within groups was highly significant ( P < 0.001), with the clusters capturing 31.5% of the total genetic variations, while 68.3% was explained by individuals within populations ( Table 2 ).
Planned pairwise comparisons between agents (Int-Rnd, Art-Rnd, Int-Art) were reported as highly significant ( p < 0.001) or significant ( p < 0.05).
Two-way ANOVA revealed that, for both compounds, concentration and light fluence each had highly significant effects on cell viability, as well as a significant interaction effect between concentration and fluence (all p < 0.001).