In the M–K trend analysis, we identified an increasing trend of daily monkeypox cases ( p < 0.001 and tau = 0.238).
Excerpts
A highly significant association was observed between discontinuing switch medication and requiring acute care (Pearson chi square = 36.5, p < 0.001).
The Friedman test indicated highly significant differences between DeepSeek-R1 and both OpenAI o1 (p < 0.001) and Grok3 (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between OpenAI o1 and Grok3 (p = 1.000)( Figure 2a ).
[29] , in a cohort of 364 adult Japanese patients with chronic HCV infection, reported a similar and highly significant ( p = 0.001) association between the rs8099917TT genotype and GGT lower values, a link that could be explained because both traits are predictive of a favourable response to therapy.
ANOVA analysis revealed that temperature exerted a highly significant effect on archaeal abundance (F = 45.32, p < 0.001); Fe 3+ concentration also had a significant influence (F = 18.67, p < 0.01), whereas the effect of NO 2 − was relatively weak and not statistically significant (F = 3.21, p > 0.05).
This study found a highly significant linear increase in the percentage of MetHb in blood as a function of nitrate dose: MetHb (%) = 41.3 × nitrate (g NO 3 ‐ /kg bw per day) + 1.2 (R 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).
Results which were statistically highly significant were presented as p < .001, for all other significant results the exact p-values was given.
The highest F ST value was observed between the Dzungarian and the southeastern Gobi ( F ST = 0.0191), the lowest between the Transaltai and the southeastern Gobi ( F ST = 0.0068), and an intermediate between the Dzungarian and the Transaltai Gobi ( F ST = 0.0088; all pairwise F ST values were highly significant at P < 0.001).
The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of treatment on mean log reduction (F(8, 235.22) = 1565.49; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 = 0.85) ( Figure 2 ).
Case Fatality Rate Trend Poisson regression analysis demonstrated a highly significant annual decline in case fatality rate (RR 0.976 per year, 95% CI 0.973–0.978; p < 0.001), corresponding to an average reduction of 2.4% per year.
In fact, permeability to FD-4 increased after PA exposure in a statistically highly significant manner, after 30 min ( p < 0.001), as compared to its internal control and even more significantly over time ( p < 0.0001, from 60 min to 360 min).
Furthermore, on intergroup comparison, the difference in mean plaque score was statistically highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001).
The effect of memory load on the standard deviation of errors was statistically highly significant ( F (3,21) = 79.95, p < 0.001; Log(BF 10 ) = 54.73) as well as the main effect of stimulus type ( F (2,14) = 7.83 p = 0.005; BF 10 = 44.77).
In contrast, the analysis revealed a highly significant reduction in pain with repeated LIPUS treatments (within-subjects effects, P=0.001).
The model fit was highly significant (F(1,18) = 47.4 p < 0.001), it explained 70.9% of the variance in SoilLoss, with a residual mean square of 0.6732.
Blood transfusion was markedly significant in IPVE (4 units (0–27) vs. 2 units (0–14); p < 0.001).
There were also striking and highly significant differences in the share of participants displaying inertia in the control condition (proportion test, p <0.001): only 12.5 % (SD = 0.33) of students never switched, compared to 45.7 % (SD = 0.50) of non-students ( Fig. 4 ).
chuatsi was highly significant, 0.640 (p < 0.001).
A highly significant difference in awareness scores was observed across levels of familiarity with AI concepts in mental healthcare (χ2 = 64.394; p < 0.001).
The results showed that dinucleotide usage patterns in all samples deviated significantly from random expectations, as indicated by highly significant chi-square test results (χ 2 , p < 0.001), suggesting pervasive non-random dinucleotide usage across the EBV genome ( Figure 5 A and Figure S6A ).
Differences were considered as significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Kruskal–Wallis tests remained highly significant (H = 69.46, p < 0.001) for both infectivity variations, indicating consistent relative benefits.
When using vBCS subjective on non-standardised images, there was a highly significant moderate agreement amongst repeat images of the same dogs (Kappa 0.41, P < 0.001).
There was highly significant ( P < 0.001) statistical relationship between primary site of tumor and histopathologic subtype.
Results of a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA using the verbal confidence sentiment scores from the text describing current self-efficacy mirrored results achieved with the current numerical self-efficacy measure, with a highly significant result showing a very large effect with significant differences between groups [ F (2, 158) = 14.0, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.151].