Moreover, small-seeded soybeans germinated under light conditions showed highly significant differences ( p > 0.001).
Excerpts
Porcine α-1 acid glycoprotein (PAGP) displayed highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects of age and gender.
Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation of r = 0.998 between CL CT and CL MRI ( p < 0.001).
Results Sperm Motility and Viability RM-ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of storage on %MOT (P < 0.001) ( Table 1 .).
Adding the hypothesized mediator, or the teachers’ self-efficacy, into the regression analysis, the beta value of the personal accomplishment became insignificant (β = 0.07, p > 0.05), whereas the beta value of the factor hypothesized as mediator was highly significant (β = 0.18, p < 0.001).
The comparison of mean values revealed a very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) between treatments and between cultivars ( Table 2 ).
Supplementation of HS in the chicken diet showed a decreasing trend of pH in the breast meat samples ( P < 0.001).
Secondly, there was a highly significant ( p -values < 0.001) increase in the hearing threshold from 0.25 kHz to 0.5 kHz.
However, by the end of the 6th month, the BMI value in the surgical group dropped to 37.11 kg/m 2 , while it remained at 45.60 kg/m 2 in the control group; this change is statistically highly significant ( Figure 1 , p < 0.001).
Lower quartiles of GIPD demonstrated a highly significant association with increasing CMRs ( p < 0.001), as shown in Table 4 and Supplementary Figure 2 .
RT The factor Congruence N was highly significant, F (1, 39) = 146.22, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.79, with smaller RTs in congruent (677 ms) than in incongruent (731 ms) trials.
Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the chemical treatment and the combined release treatment compared with the single release treatments, the organic insecticide treatment, and the untreated control at D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15 and D16.
Effect of Collection Time on Total Elaeidobius Abundance Elaeidobius abundance showed highly significant variation according to time (H = 513.4; df = 2; p < 0.001).
These findings imply highly significant mediational processes in which age ( β = -0.034, p < .001), education ( β = -0.120, p < .001), self-rated health ( β = -0.035, p < .001), and comorbidities ( β = -0.026, p < .001) were negatively associated with baseline GFD through baseline LTA participation.
In the T1D group, the overall model was highly significant (F = 18.589, p < 0.001), explaining 36.4% of the variance in LEP levels (R 2 = 0.385).
The model fit was highly significant (F(1,18) = 47.4 p < 0.001), it explained 70.9% of the variance in SoilLoss, with a residual mean square of 0.6732.
GPC-3 showed non-significant difference between different grades (p>0.05) in both malignant and peri-malignant tissue Also, our study showed a highly significant difference in Ki-67 expression between different grades in peri-malignant tissue (N) (p<0.001) but nonsignificant difference between different grades in malignant tissue (T) (p>0.05).
The frequency distributions of distances from vDNA-to-nnATRX foci and vDNA-to-nnIFI16 foci versus the distribution of distances from vDNA-to-nnRandom points at 30mpi were highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Figure 1F,G ).
The combination of site and tree species was highly significant ( p < 0.001), showing a strong interaction between these factors on the number of isolates per needle.
The data were highly significant: the β index was equal to 0.35, t = 3.74, and p < 0.001.
This new covariate was highly significant ( Z = 3.250, P = 0.001 and Z = 2.504, P = 0.012). 4th Graphical display/presentation of results HSROC curves were generated in the two clinical phases grouped according to the variables that showed a significant relationship in the meta-regression analysis.
The effect of the year was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with total dry matter yield in 2024 being approximately 76% lower than in 2023.
Results: There was a highly significant increase in a protein expression of PDFG-B in all cases of acute and chronic venous thrombosis compared to the control group with P < 0.001; furthermore, it was more specific than DD for the detection of DVT (specificity 95% and 90%, respectively).
On the corner test, the four-group analysis revealed a significant Group main effect (F(3,151) = 3.48, p = 0.034) with a highly significant Day effect (F(5,151) = 88.74, p < 0.001); the cumulative-burden AUC analysis confirmed this group difference (F(3,23) = 3.17, p = 0.046), and Tukey HSD post hoc indicated that rMSC-ION animals had significantly lower cumulative sensorimotor deficit than the published ischemic Control animals ( p = 0.040), whereas 293T-ION animals did not differ significantly from Control ( p = 0.254).
Specific comparisons between the Delta variants and other variants grouped as one were made and were highly significant ( p <0.001, data not shown) concerning those two variables.