Our analysis of the PDFs revealed that the probability of wildfire occurrence has a strong, highly significant positive relationship with daily temperature during both June to July and August to September summer intervals ( P < 0.001; Figs. 2C and 3C ).
Excerpts
Therefore, the median score of these individual visual scores revealed no non-diagnostic score. A Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing the other median scores to the SNR showed highly significant differences ( χ 2 (2) = 40.77, p < 0.001) in mean ranks of SNR between visual score categories.
Treatment with slowly eliminated antimalarials was associated with a significant trend to decreasing risk of P. vivax infection recurrence up to 63 days after both malaria due to P. falciparum monoinfection and malaria due to mixed infection ( P < .001 for trend in both cases; Figure 2 ).
The McNemar test is highly significant ( p < 0.001) for measurement of the mean cut-off UTPI in gestational weeks 11 +0 –13 +6 and 19 +0 –22 +6 .
The effect of the complications is highly significant (p<0.001).
35 In addition to years of experience, prior interaction with individuals diagnosed with ASD emerged as a strong predictor of knowledge, with highly significant associations found in both bivariable and multivariable analyses (p<0.001).
The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant main effect for the species with F (2, 81) = 178.157 and p < 0.001, indicating that the dependent variable varied substantially across the different wood species.
The differences among mean difficulty coefficients adjusted for sphericity violations proved to be highly significant in both subsets ( p < 0.001).
This result shows a highly significant (p<.001) preference of the ART compared to the neutral midpoint (0) on our rating scale.
In each case the observed enrichment was highly significant (Wilcoxon test P <0.001).
A strong and highly significant correlation ( R = 0.88, P < 0.001) between a country’s human population and MAT import value from ( 20 ) further supports the global scale up for the number of retailers: applying the retailer/person ratio to all countries with a high (≥0.8) HDI score equating to “developed” status ( 15 ).
A Kruskal–Wallis test among genotypes indicated a highly significant difference (χ 2 3 = 47.87, corrected p<0.001), as did Wilcoxon rank sum tests between WT and lox2/3 , and WT and lox2/3 x TPS10 (W 24,12 = 0, W 24,11 = 0 and corrected p - values<0.001, Figure 1C , Figure 1—source data 3 ).
Results: Tests showed variation in the anti-microbial effects of the cements and was highly significant at P < 0.001.
There is a statistically highly significant of positive correlation with moderate strength between total knowledge scale and total perception scale (p value < 0.001).
The results demonstrated that variations in fissure (X2), horizontal displacement (X3), tilt (X4), stress (X6), soil-displacement (X8), and denotes water-level (X9) exerted highly significant effects on dam safety ( p < 0.001).
LSI was associated with a significant trend toward dose reduction at the skin area irradiated with a higher dose by CPI ( P < 0.001).
All standardized factor loadings for all indicators were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and all significantly exceeded the 0.7 benchmark, vacillating from 0.709 to 0.811 for Growth Mindset, from 0.705 to 0.811 for Self-Belief, and from 0.752 to 0.809 for Effort Regulation, indicating strong item reliability (see Table 2 ; Fig. 2 ).
Adaptation effects were highly significant in both the congruent and incongruent conditions (both t -tests p < 0.001).
The Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy suggested that the sample was favourable (KMO = 0.936) and the Bartlett’s test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 6723.041, df = 561, p < 0.001).
The differences in mean daily egg production were highly significant between strains at different density treatments (p <0.001).
A highly significant difference was present if p ≤ 0.001.
The results of the factor detector analysis are shown in Figure 6 , and all influencing factors were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
2 , 3 D) Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA revaled highly significant differences among all time periods in terms of cellular number ( P < 0.001).
In addition, within each diet, highly significant decreases were detected in Phdp infected fish when compared with placebo (p < 0.001).
0.027%, for cohorts I and II, whereby the risk difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001; log-rank test).