Excerpts

Weekday screen-based digital device usage showed a decreasing trend ( P < 0.001), whereas weekend usage increased ( P < 0.001).

However, a highly significant difference was observed when comparing the two groups in terms of ABR: PWH with an ABR ⩾1 were significantly more likely to agree or accept GT ( p = 0.001).

Smooth term analysis indicated that temporal trends were highly significant in the polluted site (Ambient, polluted: edf = 5.777, p < 0.001; Warmed, polluted: edf = 5.818, p < 0.001), but were non‐significant in the non‐polluted site (SI Table S16 ). 3.2.4 Green Microalgae Concentration For green microalgae, only the June data provided sufficient variation to fit a GLM; on all subsequent sampling dates, concentrations were essentially zero.

The sampling adequacy was acceptable (overall KMO = 0.74; item MSAs: 0.69–0.91), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (10) = 217.66; p < 0.001), confirming sufficient inter-item correlations.

In terms of sequence identity, all three clades show highly significant genetic divergence from each other (all P < 0.001), indicating they have evolved into three distinct genetic lineages.

The exact p -values were categorized as follows: p < 0.05 denoted significant differences, p < 0.01 denoted highly significant differences, and p < 0.001 denoted very highly significant differences. 4.6.

Results showed that there was a highly significant effect of mean between with and without mask condition [t(34) = -10, p < 0.001].

A highly significant association was observed between intention (unintentional vs. intentional) and children’s responses across all five questions ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 3 ).

The McNemar’s test showed this change to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].

In some pairs belonging to the second group, the fibre configuration still has an impact on the strength of the correlation, i.e., the correlation between FA/RF and AD/RF becomes highly significant ( p < 0.001) when only SFP regions are considered.

The face temperature continued to increase after using both, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between conditions of wearing one or not doing it.

Common Pitfalls When Studying Adaptive Genetic Variation The use of large SNP datasets may provide insightful information about the genetic composition of populations; however, by the very nature of being a large dataset (e.g., millions of variant sites), many statistical analyses may be significant (e.g., p < 0.001) but not necessarily biologically relevant (Sham and Purcell 2014 ; Kaler and Purcell 2019 ).

Considering “ Dry cough ”, in the treatment group the number of subjects without the symptom was 18 at study entry and 36 at exit, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

rugosus in vitro cultures, with high (ranging from 0.982 for ABTS assay to 0.997 for DPPH and FRAP assays) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) PCCs ( Table 5 ).

By one-way analysis of variance, p < 0.05 was defined as significant difference and marked with “*”, p < 0.01 was defined as highly significant difference and marked with “**”, and p < 0.001 was marked with “***”.

We verified this by testing the overlap between the TF motif-gene cis -regulations inferred by MLC as applied to the LiCAT-seq human embryonic development dataset, 38 and the cis -regulations inferred by MethCorTarget applied to the DNAme human embryonic development dataset 39 : we found a highly significant overlap, odds ratio OR = 13.3 ( 12.9 − 13.8 ) ( p < 0.001 , Fisher’s exact test).

Furthermore, the individual slopes relating autoMAPSE to MAP were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and markedly heterogeneous (both positive and negative), suggesting that ventriculoarterial coupling differs substantially in different individual patients.

There were highly significant correlations between levels of total nitrogen, microcystin, and microcystin synthesis gene abundance across all surveyed sites ( p < 0.001), suggesting high levels of nitrogen supported the production of microcystin during this event.

The overall correlation was highly significant ( r = 0.904, p <0.001, Fig 3 ).

However, the association was highly significant (p = 0.001) and remains significant after a Bonferroni correction (p = 0.018).

In contrast, age exerted a highly significant effect at the first step for frequencies between 500 and 625 Hz (χ 2 = 14.2, p = 0.001).

This difference was highly significant (bootstrapping test confirming more similar fixation maps within than between fixation classes, p < .001).

3.2 Body weight evolution of the pregnant females Our results showed a slight and non-significant reduction in body weight in Et + Pyr females compared with the Pyr and control groups from D0 to D13; however, highly significant differences were observed at D15 and D18 (p < 0.001; Figure 3 ). 3.3 Body weight, size evolution, and food intake measurement Our results showed a highly significant decrease in body weight in the Et + Pyr group compared to the control (C) and pyrazole (Pyr) groups from P0 to P90 ( Figure 4A ).

We observed highly significant associations between sperm length, testis length and looping (adjusted R 2 = 0.94, F 5,21 = 90.23, p < 0.001, λ = 0.64).

Component 5 revealed a highly significant difference between the three affiliation categories (GLMM: F 2,1291 = 12.368, p ≤ 0.001) when corrected for the other two fixed factors, kinship and sex relation.