Excerpts

Table 3 shows that the factor loadings of all items are highly significant (p<0.001) and larger than 0.5.

Nevertheless, the highly significant main effects ( p = .001) and the robustness of LMMs to moderate assumption violations support the validity of our primary findings regarding temporal declines in muscle performance 4.4 Practical implications The gradual decline in leg strength throughout the race highlights the importance of strategies to manage neuromuscular fatigue.

For all the symptom scales, the differences in parent-child means were highly significant ( p < .001) for both genders with moderate to high effect sizes (0.34-0.87).

The differences between the IFN treatment groups and NC group were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

This highly significant correlation ( p -value < 0.001) suggests a strong relationship between the PMSSQ surface and its ability to adsorb chemicals based on physicochemical properties.

Highly significant improvement in overall SPICE-R2 scores between the pre- and post-surveys was noted ( p < 0.001; 95% CI – 6.65, − 3.23) indicating that this IPE experience successfully enhanced students’ understanding and appreciation of interprofessional collaboration.

The correlation was as high as 0.70 for MOD and DEX (the slope of the OLS line, close to 45°, is highly significant: P < 0.001; Fig. 3C ).

The pathways related to axon guidance, long term potentiation and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) were highly significant (P<10 −3 ).

The heterogeneity test showed highly significant among 11 cities ( P value < 0.001).

It is noteworthy that the difference between UVB-L and UVB-M treatments was, in all cases, highly significant (from p < 0.001 to p < 0.0001), especially during days 12 and 24 of UVB exposure.

Within-group analyses of the SCAS reports from pre to 12-month follow-up (see Fig 4 and Table 4 ) revealed large and highly significant improvements for all responders (adolescents: d = .99, p < .001; mothers: d = 1.10, p < .001; and fathers: d = .94, p < .001).

This difference was highly significant (p<0.001).

A formal comparison of configurations according to the error rate revealed highly significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, H (7, 371) = 88.8, P < 0.001), with beetle configurations having lower error rates than fly configurations (Table 2 , Online Resource: ESM 1 ).

[ 74 ] found that the prevalence of ER-negative breast cancer was higher in their diabetic patients compared with the non-diabetic group; however, although the small difference, 32.2% versus 30.6%, was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), this may have been affected beyond its biological influence by the large sample sizes.

Additionally, the GFAP protein expression levels showed a decreasing trend in the hippocampus of the LPS + PBS ( P = 0.001) and LPS + UC-MSC groups ( P = 0.000), compared with the control group.

Variability of seed morphological and biochemical traits The variation was highly significant among accessions for all the quantitative seed morphological traits ( p < 0.001).

The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences among the three groups (χ2=20 633.5, p<0.001).

Highly significant phenotypic differences ( p -value < 0.001 for T-test) for E. necator mycelium growth and sporulation intensity between haplotype-derived groups were found comparing the seedlings averaged rAUDPC values (Fig. 6 ).

All changes were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Linde et al., 2006 ).

‘perceived negative impacts of allocation mechanism’ have negative effects on ‘overall health professionals’ satisfaction’) had a positive coefficient of 0.29 for Kenya with a highly significant level of t (300) = 5.83, p <. 001 while path hypothesis 5 (i.e. ‘benefits of national health care resource allocation mechanism’ have positive effects on ‘overall health professionals’ satisfaction’) had a negative coefficient of -0.24 with a significant level of t (300) = -2.81, p <. 01.

Longitudinal mental health trajectories In the quantitative analysis, changes of the PHQ-4 score and the PHQ-2 subscale score were highly significant [cohen's d = 0.16 total, (subscale 0.18), ( t (740) = 4.24, (4.99), P < 0.001 each] whereas the change in the GAD-2 subscale was less pronounced [cohen's d = 0.08, t (740) = 2.13, P = 0.03] ( Table 2 ).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001.

Statistical significance was evaluated using Student t -test, where * p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference, ** p < 0.01 indicated a highly significant difference, and *** p < 0.001 indicated an extremely significant difference. 3.

Overall, greater taste preference was associated with a higher willingness to pay, as indicated by a highly significant positive correlation between the difference scores for taste ratings and for willingness to pay, r (42) = .56, p <.001.

There was a moderate, but statistically highly significant correlation between the matrix of transmission events inferred from the genomic data and the epidemiological ‘direct-contact’ events ( R =0.147; P <0.001; Mantel test).