Model 1 reveals that, when compared with pretest knowledge scores, the zero-order coefficient for post-test knowledge is positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
This analysis confirmed that the first five principal components (PC1-PC5) were highly significant (p < 0.001), as their eigenvalues substantially exceeded those obtained from randomly permuted data.
Additionally, the quadratic term ( x 2 ) was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) within this quadratic model, distinguishing it from the cubic model, in which the cubic term ( x 3) did not attain statistical significance ( p =0.316).
The results of the study showed that the correlation between clot stiffness and CCTs was highly significant ( r = 0.91, 0.93, and 0.93; p < 0.001, respectively).
The mean value of calcium in saliva was calculated to be 3.06 mg/dl in the case group and 1.96 mg/dl in the control group with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) between the two groups [ Table 3 ].
The mutations (D67N, M184V), (M184V, T215SY), and (M41ML, L74LI, V75VI, M184V, T215TNS) were highly significant associated with high-level resistance, represented by 1.8% each ( p <0.001).
Results: WOSI, Subjective Shoulder Value, and Rowe score showed a highly significant improvement at all time points of follow-up ( P < .001).
Results: Highly significant ( P < 0.001) improvements in KAP scores, PI scores, GI scores and caries activity were reported at 3 weeks and 6 months follow-up examination.
Mean TAT decreased by 23.82 hours, with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirming a highly significant reduction (p < 0.001).
The GnRH levels from NP-treated hypothalamus showed an increasing trend, especially significant in male 10 nM- and 100 nM-treated groups ( p <0.001) and female 1 nM-, 100 nM- and 1 μM-trated groups ( p <0.05, p <0.01 and p <0.05, respectively).
Total PSQI score : The overall PSQI score showed a highly significant effect of time (F( 1, 27 ) = 42.35, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.39).
The largest magnitude of difference was between NFTD and NLSD, with NFTD being 10.5 dB lower ( p < 0.001, highly significant).
After excluding Pzeb1 from further analyses, F ST values still remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).
AMOVA analysis showed highly significant (p < 0.001) genetic differentiation among regions.
Additionally, there was a highly significant association (p < 0.001 Fisher’s Exact test, FDR adjusted) with predicted enhancer regions.
Highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences mainly in the percentage of actinomycetes, the conductivity, and the granulometry parameters (fine silt, large silt, fine sand, large sand, and clay) were observed ( Table S1 ).
The expression level of CpIML4 was highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the control group at 24 hpi, indicating that CpIML4 RNAi was reliable for further study.
Lysis induced by all anti-MUC1 antibodies was highly significant (p<0.001 in Student's t-test) in MUC1-expressing tumor cell lines, when compared to the ovarian cell line ES-2, the melanoma cell line SK-mel-1 and NHEC, three MUC1-negative cell lines.
The time taken for the onset of analgesia recorded in different groups varied and the difference were very highly significant ( P < 0.001).
As expected, PCoA analysis of OTUs pooled from all mouse genotypes revealed strong clustering based on site and highly significant differences in microbiome composition were detected (ANOSIM, p<0.001) ( Figure 3 ).
The overall reduction in blood pressure after ablation was highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the mean reduction values for systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 27.4 ± 21.3 mm/Hg and 23.1 ± 17.4 mm/Hg, respectively, which was shown in Table 2 ; Fig. 4 .
This difference is highly significant (x2 = 11.62, p <0.001).
The AUROC curve was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for quadruple (AUROC, 0.966; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.940-0.991) and triple tests (AUROC, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.927-0.983).
RD treatment at 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg to FA-injected animals significantly increased the testosterone level as compared to FA treated group, but it was highly significant in RD40 as compared to lower doses ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 1 ).
Usually, we refer to statistically significant as P < 0.05 and statistically highly significant as P < 0.001 (less than one in a thousand chance of being wrong).