Population structure and differentiation Fisher’s exact tests revealed highly significant genetic differentiation among all pairs of populations ( P -values < 0.001 in all cases) (Table 1 ).
Excerpts
Regarding antioxidant activities (ABTS + and DPPH), variables X 1 and X 2 2 showed negative effects, while variable X 2 had highly significant positive effects ( p < 0.001).
Overall, a highly significant (p<0.001) protective effect of the AG genotype of rs4656461 in the TMCO1 gene was observed for glaucoma ( Table 1 ).
A comparison of self-perceived oral health status as indicated by a single question and the results of the OHIP-14 revealed a statistically highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
In this study, we observed a significant trend towards a positive association between CRS and PFS (p<0.001).
ANVOA statistics have demonstrated a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.001).
The Kruskal–Wallis test for the comparison of SEMS scores among the lignocaine, ice cone, and clove oil groups yielded highly significant results ( p = 0.001).
The results of the frailty model including all 81 subtypes simplified the risk into low and high risks, which were statistically highly significant, p < 0.001 (Fig. 8 A).
A Friedman’s analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction of the difference suppression values at different test frequencies in the total participants group indicated a statistically less suppression for 4000 Hz compared to 2828 Hz ( P < 0.03) and highly significant difference between the following frequencies: 4000 and 2000 Hz ( P < 0.001); 4000 and 1001 Hz ( P < 0.001); 4000 and 1414 Hz ( P < 0.001); 2828 and 2000 Hz ( P < 0.001); 2828 and 1001 Hz ( P < 0.001) and 2000 and 1001 Hz ( P < 0.001).
Additionally, there was a decreasing trend in female proportion as early WBS neck counts increased ( p < 0.001).
Data was considered statistically significant if the p value is < to 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001.
All predictors in both models were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
All predictors of foraging habitat quality in the additive model were highly significant (p < 0.001; Table 2 ), with 51.1% deviance explained by the model, and over 99% of which was explained by the model’s fixed effects.
The coefficients of X 3 , X 1 X 2 , X 2 X 3 , X 1 2 , X 2 2 , and X 3 2 were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while those of X 1 and X 2 were statistically significant ( p < 0.01).
Similarly, BLG was the major allergen for serum number 9 and 10 with extremely significant differences ( *** P < 0.001); it was also one of allergens for serum number 7, 8 and 11 with varying degrees of differences (serum number 7 and 11, * P < 0.05; serum number 8, ** P < 0.01).
There was a significant difference between SA and DYS: W = 3.844, p = .050, plus a highly significant difference between DYS and SD: W = 19.252, p < .001; and SA and SD: W = 9.880, p = .002.
We found highly significant differences ( p <0.001) among several categories of nonconveyed cases and on-scene time intervals among EMS centers.
A regression analysis of weekly mouse bodyweights showed that the difference in weight development between lunularin and AL-control mice was highly significant (p < 0.001).
Also, the mobility reduction following the lockdown measures were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) through all stratifications considered (age, gender, and region).
Among the smokers, the value was even higher in COPD patients (mean value of 10.45 ± 3.03 ppm) in contrast to others (7.05 ± 1.56 ppm) but was highly significant (p-value < 0.001).
For Engagement, the U statistic was 2034.00 with a Z-score of − 3.97 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001), below the critical value (Ucrit = 2580).
The statistical value of * P < 0.05 is considered as significant difference; ** P < 0.01 is considered as extremely significant difference; *** P < 0.001 is considered as very significant difference.
Along with greater ARS scores, a decreasing trend in the proportion of participants with a diagnosis of dementia was observed: in G0 78%, in Gl 82%, in G2 75%, and in G3 56% (p<0.001).
We achieved a highly significant accuracy of [73.3 ± 3.7]% ( Figure 4 B left end and Figure 4 C top left, t-test p < 0.001).
Quantification of the staining intensity demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank test) increase in protein expression for Calnexin (1.6-fold) and AnxA2 (1.5-fold) and a 1.3-fold increase of AnxA5 (at the border of significance, p = 0.05) ( Fig. 6 ).