In both models, the respective predictor showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects on the number of flowers per tree (Table 3 ).
Excerpts
Fisher’s exact test revealed highly significant differences in the distribution of leptospiral species prevalence across host species/collected locations among the 394 animal-associated strains (p<0.001 for all comparisons) ( S3 and S4 Tables).
A highly significant association was found between professional categories and avoidance of smoking in hypertensive patients (AOR, 7.98; p = 0.001) and diabetics (AOR, 14.78; p<0.001) (Tables 1 and 2 ).
The Pearson correlation coefficients for the association between age and the three objective memory tests were clearly significant (LM r = − 0.39, Voc r = −.049 and LNS r = −.041; all p < 0.001).
The mixed-effects model revealed a highly significant association (b = 2.167, p < 0.001).
Regarding locomotion, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in Rosow-Breslau mean scores was observed between participants with and without an alert (1.23 vs 2.19, respectively), validating the tool for physical disability screening in this context.
For example, the association with age was highly significant ( p <0.001) in all scenarios requiring 10 hours minimum wear-time per day but non-significant ( p >0.05) in the scenario requiring 12 hours minimum wear-time per day and at least 5 days with no requirements on weekends.
A highly significant logarithmic trend for the train length effect was revealed for each condition [exact: F (1, 18) = 22.52, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.56; wn: F (1, 18) = 228.30, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.93; wp: F (1, 18) = 35.10, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.66].
The factor of time is highly significant in the intervention group, F (2, 56) = 7.47, p = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.211.
Analysis of variance for root and yield traits The ANOVA for root traits under the hydroponics platform ( Table 2 ) revealed highly significant differences among genotypes (p< 0.001), traits (p< 0.001), and genotype × trait interaction (p< 0.001), indicating substantial genetic variability and trait-specific effects.
The score stratified patients into low- (0–1 points), intermediate- (2–3 points), and high-risk (4–5 points) groups, with highly significant differences in 2-year OS rates of 84.2%, 58.3%, and 16.7%, respectively ( P<0.001 ) ( Table 3 , Figure 2 ).
Regarding training topics, the results show that the vast majority of respondents with knowledge of the medical waste management process (62.5%) have already received training on the sorting of pharmaceutical medical waste, with a highly significant association ( ( χ 2 = 73.63, p < 0.001).
There is a highly significant positive correlation between age of onset with EDSS score at the last follow-up ( Figures 4A, B ), irrespective of AQP4-IgG serostatus ( p < 0.001).
The most substantial change was observed in the emotion regulation domain, with all items showing highly significant improvement ( p < 0.001), reflecting the AR intervention’s emphasis on emotional engagement and interactive responsiveness.
Most of the genetic variation was between species (65.5% of the total genetic variation) and 24.9% within species, and all values were highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 2 ).
Assessing the effect direction of the identified neonatal mortality predictors using logistic regression The top three variables most relatively important in the XGBoost model were also highly significant in traditional logistic regression (early breastfeeding, birth weight, and household size, all with p-values <0.001).
The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test (SPSS 21) was applied for statistical analysis to figure out significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) parameters differentiating between patients with glaucoma and controls.
A highly significant RAE was present in both former [χ 2 (3, 764) = 60.36; p < 0.001; ω = 0.31] and current youth ski racers [χ 2 (3, 702) = 43.13; p < 0.001; ω = 0.29] with an over-representation of athletes of Q1 (30.3–34.2%) and a clear under-representation of athletes of Q4 (14.8–15.0%).
4 ). The mean bone volume of the augmented site was 372.2 ± 179.4 mm 3 immediately post-operatively (T1) and 230.2 ± 185.7 mm 3 after 12 months (T2), leading to an extent of total resorption relative to the original bone volume of 43.7% ± 19.0%, being highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Figs. 4 and 5 ).
At six months, there was a highly significant difference in the CAL ( p < 0.001).
In the M–K trend analysis, we found a positive trend of reported dengue cases ( P -value < 0.001 and tau = 0.26).
Procrustes MANOVAs of shape and size against species are both highly significant, with species means accounting for 90% of the variation in size and 79% of the variation in shape ( p = 0.001 for both tests, figure 3 a–c ).
The results revealed a highly significant difference ( χ 2 = 22.66 , p < 0.001 ), confirming that the detection model performs differently depending on whether the input was written by a human or generated by an AI model.
We observed highly significant decreases in BW (−6.5%, p < 0.001), and LLLS volume (−22.3%, p < 0.001) and an amelioration of patient clinical status.
The log-rank also reported a highly significant association between survival and ferritin values with P < 0.001.