The results of this investigation align with these steps: (1) The results of the study indicate a strong and statistically significant association between NHRM practices and innovation capability (ß = 0.34, p < 0.001); (2) innovation capability was statistically highly significant with innovative performance (ß = 0.18, p < 0.001); (3) NHRM practices exhibited a highly significant relationship with innovative performance (ß = 0.23, p < 0.001); and (4) when innovation capability was simultaneously regressed among NHRM practices and innovative performance, the effect of NHRM practices became insignificant (ß = 0.04), demonstrating a full mediation effect.
Excerpts
Two-way interaction terms between the forest patch coverage-banana crops and the dam surface-banana crops variables also appeared marginally significant to explain the increase of BU in Côte d'Ivoire, with odds-ratio 1.0067 ( P <0.001; near 0.6%) and 1.0588 ( P <0.001; near an order of 6%), respectively.
When the data from all three dairies were combined, there was an overall highly significant difference between the traps ( × 2 = 76.52, df = 2, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
The majority of pairwise Φ PT values were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for the seven ( K = 7) clusters derived from nested analysis (Table 5 ).
The overall model demonstrated good discriminative ability with a concordance statistic of 0.786 (SE = 0.036) and was highly significant according to likelihood ratio test ( χ 2 = 22.07, df = 6, p = 0.001), Wald test ( χ 2 = 19.84, df = 6, p = 0.003) and logrank test ( χ 2 = 22.28, df = 6, p = 0.001) (Table 3 ).
A highly significant positive linear relationship (r 2 > 0.996; p < 0.001; Figure 7 ) covering almost the full incubation period indicated that CRDS‐SCGIM produced results that were consistent with those of the traditional method.
Intraclass correlations for inter- and intra-rater agreement on the presence or absence of errors and a class of errors were all highly significant ( r = .99; p < .001).
In contrast, stage B HF patients exhibited a highly significant increase in MMP3 staining score compared to controls ( p < 0.001).
A highly significant vertical asymmetry was observed: 56.3% of all interventions were performed in the upper jaw compared to 43.7% in the lower jaw (χ 2 = 480.58, p < 0.001), a finding that remained significant after correction and is consistent with established epidemiological patterns.
Two highly significant biological categories, immune response ( p < 0.001) and cell cycle ( p < 0.001) were identified with 119 and 71 genes in each category respectively (Supplementary Table 2 ).
Subsequent MANOVA performed on this dataset revealed that our discriminant analysis was highly significant (Wilks Lambda = 0.017; F (2,32) = 66.3; p < 0.001).
In the sensitivity analysis, even in patients without very severe AS defined by V max or MPG criteria, the excess risk of group 3 relative to group 1 was highly significant (HR, 1.81, 95% CI, 1.21–2.71; P <0.001), whereas the excess risk of group 2 relative to group 1 was no longer significant (HR, 1.27, 95% CI, 0.95–1.70; P =0.11).
The linear mixed-effects model revealed statistically highly significant main effects for speaker group, F (2, 42.2) = 12.3, p < .001, and quantity category, F (3, 23.0) = 22.0, p < .001, and a significant main effect for speech rate, F (1, 36.9) = 4.6, p < .05.
We observed a strong and highly significant differentiation at locus EFbis (F ST = 0.255, Fisher exact test: P < 0.001) while the other ten loci exhibited very low and non-significant levels of differentiation.
Statistical analysis has shown highly significant differences (p < 0.001) between the net O.D. of placentae from normal pregnancies and the placentae of mothers with gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and drug abusers.
As expected, there was a highly significant difference in CVA, with the FHP group demonstrating a much smaller angle than the NHP group (t(98) = −23.15, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = −4.63). 3.2.
A highly significant (P < 0.001) decrease in FEC was observed on farm B both 7 and 21 days PT.
There was an increasing trend between severity of health state and difference between the SWT with other tariffs and Cuzick’s test confirmed this (Z ranged 6.29 to 7.86, P < 0.001).
Statistical analysis again indicated that these differences in growth were highly significant across all time points (p<0.001).
Specifically: several authors reported highly significant group differences ( p ≤ 0.001) [ 32 , 34 , 39 , 42 ].
For the DPPH, Folin–Ciocalteu and CV methods, one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among oils (all p < 0.001).
Differences were considered statistically significant when P <0.05 and highly significant when P <0.001.[ 10 ] RESULTS Table 1 summarizes the clinical and histopathological data of the studied patients.
However, there was a highly significant effect of the region from which subjects originated (REGION x INFECTION, χ 2 2 = 16.1, p <0.001).
Notably, these expression differences were highly significant at multiple stages ( P < 0.001), highlighting the potential importance of FABP3 and ENSGALG00000054605 in regulating egg-laying performance.
Stable isotope uptake Both the uptake kinetics of carbon ( 13 C-bicarbonate) and nitrogen (15N-ammonium) followed highly significant models driven by species, time and treatment ( p < 0.001, Fig. 2 ).