Intergroup differences after three months were highly significant (p < 0.001), reflecting improved bone quality with T-PRF, as observed in several studies by Aldommari et al., Ibrahim et al., and Malcangi et al.
Excerpts
anguillarum were highly significant in all Tetraselmis experiments, as compared to the controls (P<0.001) and to the mutant (P<0.001).
Validation of multiplex PCR assays for simultaneous detection of α 0 -thalassemia and SNP rs3760053 As shown in Table 2 , a highly significant difference ( P <0.001) in DAF between α 0 -thalassemia carrier and normal subject for the rs3760053 (T>G) was observed and G allele was strongly linked to the SEA deletion α 0 -thalassemia in this population.
According to the analysis of variance (Table 2 ), both models developed for shoot and root dry weight were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
89 Bonus-time using 1 μM GABA was robust and highly significant (21.7 ± 3.2 minutes, t[9] = 15.8, P < 0.001).
The proportion of OCT‐positive patients above LLOQ after disinfection was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001, one sample proportion test) compared to prior to disinfection.
Although the age differences are highly significant ( P < 0.001), they have no clinical relevance.
In the last hour of the observation period, a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in lying time in the lateral position was detected compared to the three previous intervals (4–3 h; 3–2 h; 2–1 h) ( Figure 3 A).
In contrast, the follow‐up data showed a highly significant between‐group difference ( p < 0.001), with only the combined and ECHT groups maintaining MCID benefits (76.7%, 60.0%, respectively). 3.2.3.
In this way, the average fetal AC of experimental group 1 was less than that of the control group and was completely significant ( P < 0.001).
The analysis revealed a highly significant inverse correlation ( p < 0.001), indicating that as the number of FHs increased, both the DS and the IT values decreased.
The number of spermatocytes was lowest in the Heat Control group, showing a highly significant reduction compared to Control at day 30 ( P < 0.001), while the Niacin 1 and Niacin 2 groups exhibited significantly increased spermatocyte counts relative to Heat Control at both time points ( P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), with Niacin 2 displaying the highest counts at day 30.
Statistical significance was defined as follows: p < 0.05 was considered significant and marked with *; p < 0.01 was considered highly significant and marked with **; p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant and marked with ***; and p > 0.05 was considered not significant and marked as ns.
The frontal lobe's volumetric w-scores differed statistically highly significant between both dementia types for both the right and left frontal lobes (Welch's t-test, left frontal lobe: t = 8.94, df = 147.0, p < 0.001; right frontal lobe: t = 9.17, df = 150.1, p < 0.001).
The interaction between sugar and time was now highly significant (F 1,76 = 10.914, P = 0.001), with no significant effect of time (F 1,76 = 0.906, P > 0.05) ( Fig. 1E,F ).
When WSS and plaque burden were treated as continuous variables and were assumed to have a linear relationship, we observed a positive trend ( P <0.001).
With regard to ChCl-MaA, the pH value of ChCl-MaA (D) and the extraction temperature (E) had extremely significant effects ( p < 0.001) on pectin yield, but the extraction time had no influence on pectin yield.
Only highly significant correlations ( p <0.001) were considered for this analysis.
controls (median 2.1 × 10 9 /L, IQR: 1.5–3.0), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
We assumed in the paper that p <0.05 means a statistically significant relationship, p <0.01 means a statistically highly significant relationship, p <0.001 means a statistically very highly significant relationship. 4.
A highly significant negative association was observed between age and number of PCOS phenotypic features ( P < 0.001),women with all three features were 5.6 years younger than those with none (28.2 ± 3.8 vs 33.8 ± 5.1 years, respectively).
This small difference between the monkeys, however, was highly significant (t-test, t=7.80, df=5921, p<0.001) due to the large number of trials.
Accordingly, the tensile strength of crude extracts of 10% ointment was statistically highly significant (P < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment treated and untreated groups but it showed slightly lesser strength as compared to the standard treated group.
Additionally, there were elevated circulating levels of Elabela-21 and Elabela-11 in the overweight cases with recently developed T2DM and prediabetes more than in healthy controls with highly significant differences (P < 0.001).
This treatment difference in week 4 of the second generation was already highly significant ( F 1,118 = 42.13, P < 0.001) and it had become absolute by 8 weeks, when nymphs were entirely absent from all the populations exposed to 2.7% rifampcin and 11 of the 16 populations exposed to 0.9% rifampicin.