Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp <.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing WID‐qEC levels in all 22 cancer cases that had WID‐qEC test results available with either all cancer‐free women or all women without a cancer diagnosis (i.e., cancer‐free and women without adequate histology combined) showed highly significant differences ( p <.001) (Figure 2B ).
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The comparison between the two studied categories according to antenatal history and family history showed that the gap between the two groups was not statistically important, however by comparing the two categories as regarding natal history, there was highly significant association between birth resuscitation and neonatal sepsis (p = 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The z-test was used for checking the skewness of scalar variables: number of RTI episodes reported at each year of follow-up, as well as the mean number of RTI episodes during the follow-up, displayed highly significant positive skewness coefficients ( p < 0.001) and were transformed before analysis according to the formula log (x + k).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, 7 and 16 days after the booster (7 dpb and 16 dpb), the mean BoHV-1-specific SN antibody titers in the qmv Sub-RVFV prime–boost group were 141 and 101, respectively, which were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) because they represented an increase of more than 7-fold compared to that on 0 dpb.
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results from the SEM indicate a good model fit; the chi-squared ( χ 2 ) value was highly significant ( p < .001), as were the values of the goodness-of-fit index (GFI; 0.94), the comparative fit index (CFI; 0.92), and the mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; 0.012), which implies that the model fits the data well.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
for all parasites combined) differed significantly between countries, and there was a highly significant interaction between country and sampling period, indicating that seasonality in prevalence is site-dependent (GLM Chisq tests: Country: P < 0.001; Sampling Period: P = 0.059; Country * Sampling Period: P < 0.001).
highly significantP values = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
RESULTS: Students’ skills regarding nasogastric tube insertion, urinary catheterization, and intramuscular injection revealed highly significant differences between the study groups associated with “Greenhouse-Geisser” correction at P values = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001; and large size effect by Partial Eta Squared (0.887, 0.902, and 0.582), respectively, of simulation strategy, and at P values = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001; and large size effect by Partial Eta Squared (0.813, 0.936, and 0.883), respectively, of blended strategy, and at P values = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001; and large size effect by Partial Eta Squared (0.871, 0.739, and 0.667), respectively, of self-directed strategy.