The only pathogen within these species is Clostridium botulinum for which however there are two groups of points biasing the regression estimate (Additional file 3 ); even by including this species the result is still highly significant ( p =0.001).
Excerpts
Results Kendall's coefficient of concordance among experts (n = 24) was highly significant (P < 0.001), but low (0.29 and 0.18 for housing systems and hazards respectively).
In MS, however, highly significant correlations (ρ ≈ 0.5 and p < 0.001) were found for FA-weighted metrics, EDSS and BPF and significant correlations were also found for age, disease duration and WM-LL, although with lower coefficients (ρ ≈ 0.3 and p < 0.01).
Percentage of neutrophils and monocytes having produced hydrogen peroxide Comparing all data of the observed time period, there was a highly significant difference among lipid emulsions for each concentration used in the present study (p < 0.001), Figure 2 .
2 , grain yield of the tested genotypes increased by a factor of 2.5 between 1915 and 2022 and the genotypic variability for yield was highly significant (F(13, 70) = 18.30, P < 0.001).
There was an increasing trend in VS among all PLHIV (IRR: 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03; p < 0.001).
We observed a highly significant increase in the Y4/Y3 ratio ( p = 0.001) and a significant decrease in the Y3/Y1 ratio ( p = 0.03), while the Y4/Y1 ratio did not change ( p = 0.078).
The likelihood ratio test comparing model 1 and model 2 was highly significant (χ 2 = 34.72; P < .001), indicating that LPR contributed independent predictive information even after accounting for lactate.
We found no reliable differences for type of contrast, since 60% of the tests revealed p > 0.05, but highly significant differences for time bin, F (3, 78) = 64, p < 0.001.
When comparing trends between interportal and T‐capsulotomy utilization, a highly significant difference in response distributions between techniques over time was observed ( P < .001).
Depth was a highly significant factor associated to the density of jigs in all periods (p<0.001; except in Year 1 when it was marginally non-significant).
The index of the four groups showed a decreasing trend as follows: CFBB/Zn 2+ /CS > CFBB/CS > CFBB/Zn 2+ > CFBB ( p < 0.001).
We detected highly significant correlations between BMD in skull and femur ( r = 0.99; p < 0.001; n = 13) and skull and vertebrae ( r = 0.97; p < 0.001; n = 8).
Comparison of survival curves using the log-rank test indicated highly significant differences, for both mothers (p < 0.001, chi square = 16.217) and fathers (p < 0.001, chi square = 17.084).
Combined with results from lean to morbidly obese subjects (n = 39) from previous study, the collective data show a highly significant correlation between BAT activity and body composition (P<0.001), respectively explaining 64% and 60% of the variance in BMI (r = 0.8; P<0.001) and BF% (r = 0.75; P<0.001).
The linear relationship between digestibility coefficients from the 2 databases was highly significant, an R 2 of 0.810 ( P < 0.001).
Seventy-eight percent of the tumours were CD40 positive, with a highly significant association with both lower stage and lower grade ( P <0.001).
Finally, in RBC there is a clear trend in favor of the Cell Salvage (p < 0.001), although the moderate heterogeneity between studies should be noted ( Fig. 5 ).
However, when time was incorporated as a continuous variable in our analysis, there was an increasing trend in MMP-9 activities over time ( p = 0.001).
Hysterectomy procedures displayed an interesting trend, whereby a longer LOS associated with ORCs ( P <0.001) was observed in conjunction with almost equivalent total procedure costs for the ORC and OAH cohorts ( P =0.542).
The KMO coefficient was found to be 0.87, the chi-square value for Bartlett's test was highly significant (p < .001), and the data were suitable and sufficient for the factor analysis.
Highly significant time and group × time interaction effects were observed for SSS ( F = 38.340 and 29.187, respectively; both P < 0.001).
A highly significant correlation was found TE s and TE wp in this experiment (Pearson's correlation coefficient between genotype means: r = 0.71, p < 0.001), and also in Experiment 1 (Pearson's correlation coefficient between genotype × treatment means: r = 0.90, p < 0.001).
Differences were highly significant in all cases (p < 0.001).
Effect of Collection Time on Total Elaeidobius Abundance Elaeidobius abundance showed highly significant variation according to time (H = 513.4; df = 2; p < 0.001).