Highly significant differences (p<0.001***) were observed in prevalence of four pNLGS (N130, N295, N392 and N448) between South Africa and India, having most disease burden associated with subtype C.
Excerpts
Those with highly significant correlations ( P < 0.001) were removed from the data set.
Both analyses showed highly significant p-values < 0.001.
The analysis revealed highly significant genetic differentiation among populations ( F st = 0.77, p <0.001), which accounted for 76.68% of the entire genetic variation.
The difference in kurtosis between sites with negatively peaked LFP (median kurtosis: 32.9; n = 716) and positively peaked LFP (median kurtosis: 2.3; n = 95) is highly significant (Mann–Whitney-U test; u = 11,657, P <0.001).
Residual covariances among latent variables The positive and negative dimensions of the GAAIS showed a highly significant negative residual association ( β = −0.432, p < 0.001), indicating an inverse relationship between the two: higher levels of positive cognitive attitudes toward AI were associated with lower levels of negative cognitive attitudes.
[ 28 ] assessed this combination for managing internal derangement of the TMJ and reported a highly significant (p<0.001) improvement in pain and function compared to diclofenac.
The interaction between the two factors was also highly significant (F = 14.7, df = 12, p < 0.001), indicating that photoperiodic effects on the rate of nymphal development substantially differed among the studied populations.
With the addition of PL, the ternary SDs showed highly significant (***, p < 0.001) changes in the SL release profile ( Fig. 3 ).
All tests showed highly significant results ( p < 0.001) with a higher mean for the glioma average (λ = 0, Wilcoxon statistic = 6.40 × 10 5 , mean difference = 2.63; λ = 10, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.24 × 10 8 , mean difference = 2.15; λ = 20, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.85 × 10 8 , mean difference = 3.09; λ = 30, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.11 × 10 8 , mean difference = 4.04; λ = 40, Wilcoxon statistic = 9.73 × 10 7 , mean difference = 4.94; all λ pooled, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.37 × 10 8 , mean difference = 3.56).
There was a highly significant relationship between torsional ME ( R p /Ar.ct) and periosteal circumference ( p < 0.001, group R 2 values = 0.71–0.89, Fig. 1 ).
An increasing trend in mean HbA1c was found in healthy and high-risk hosts (healthy hosts, 0.07 ± 0.02% [ P < 0.001]; high-risk hosts, 0.10 ± 0.03% [ P < 0.001]; Table 2 ).
The reaction time decreased with the increase of the subjective significance level, namely the reaction to low significant words was significantly longer than to medium significant [ t (30) = 4.555, p < 0.001], and longer than to highly significant ones [ t (30) = 6.718, p < 0.001].
Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant association ( P < .001 genome‐wide).
Statistical analysis ( t -test) showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) changes in C R * between any two consecutive measurement times.
The percentage of the sums of squares of accession for both traits and in both crops was always above 80%, with differences among accessions being highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).
Additionally, non-specific oral findings were noted in 3 patients with psoriasis and 24 in the control group, a difference considered highly significant ( P value < 0.001).
With respect to antioxidants parameters, total phenolic content exhibited the highest positive significant correlation with FRAP ( r = 0.37, p < 0.05) and highly significant negative correlation with DPPH ( r = −0.61, p < 0.001).
Splenocytes from mice immunized with multivalent DNA vaccines pV273- sod , pV278- sod, or pV273-278- sod significantly increased IFN- γ production after being stimulated with 2 or 10 μ g/ml of recombinant proteins, reaching highly significant P values when compared to control groups PBS and pVAX ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 3(a) ).
Specifically, chickens in footpad-inoculated Group A showed highly significant differences in BFW compared with the control group ( p < 0.001), followed by Groups B, E, and D, which also showed significant differences ( p < 0.01).
Detached Pod Bioassay under Laboratory Conditions during 2019 Rainy Season We detected highly significant differences among the ILs for all traits, viz., pre-larval weight, damage rating, post-larval weight, and % larval weight gain ( p ≤ 0.001).
In Group 1, on comparison between baseline and immediately after treatment, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months, the results were very highly significant ( P = 0.001).
The treatment contrast between LoSD and HSD from the GLMM was highly significant (2.7±0.06 (SE), z = 47.7; p<<0.001).
The lower maternal educational level increased the risk for ER visit, with a significant trend (p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis of change in alveolar height with time was done by one way ANOVA test [ Table 3b ] and was found to be very highly significant ( P < 0.001).