Excerpts

KMO analysis yielded an index of 0.92, and in combination with a highly significant BTS, χ 2 (df = 66) = 2969.82, p < 0.001, confirmed that the data distribution satisfied the psychometric criteria [ 42 , 43 ].

P -value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant, P -value < 0.01 is highly significant, P -value < 0.001 is extremely significant.

Recovery and stress within the AVEM patterns The examination of both the main scales of stress and recovery as well as their subscales showed highly significant differences between individuals in the AVEM A and B risk pattern groups and the AVEM G and S health pattern groups ( p < 0.001).

In addition, neural survival is compromised due to inhibition of nerve growth factor (NGF) transcription [ 33 ] and a highly significant correlation between the decrease in circulating levels of NGF and the severity of CIPN has been reported ( P < 0.001) [ 34 ].

Once again, the results of this correlation analyses show that both lostness measures correlate negatively with learning, yet this time the correlation is significant for global lostness ( p = 0.015) and highly significant for local lostness ( p = 0.001).

This suggests that there may be some sensitivity to the temporal relation that would require further testing, but kind of sound is likely to play a major role. The interaction between sound type used during imprinting exposure and test condition (electronic supplementary material, Extended figure S4) was highly significant ( F 3,271 = 8.049, p < 0.001; figure 2 ), as was the main effect of sound type ( F 1,271 = 29.473, p < 0.001), but not that of temporal structure.

Further analysis with Spearman's correlation revealed a highly significant moderate negative correlation between AOR and language outcome (Spearman rho = −0.435, n = 52, p = 0.001; Fig 1B ).

In the segmented regression analysis by ICU patient-days, fentanyl presented with an increasing trend in use before the intervention (β = 16; 95%CI 7 - 25; p = 0.002), which decreased in level (β = - 128; 95%CI -195 - -62; p = 0.001) and then in slope for a decreasing trend (β = - 24; 95%CI -35 - -13; p < 0.001) ( Table 2 , Figure 2 ).

We also found a highly significant effect of stimulus type on mean accuracy by comparing the reduced model with a random-intercept only model (χ 2 (1) = 23.34, P < 0.001; ΔAIC = 21.34), with shape stimuli decreasing accuracy by 0.146 ± 0.025 (standard error) compared to color stimuli.

Due to skewness of positive mutuality, we subsequently used the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test, which revealed that these were highly significant differences (sensitive responding: χ 2 (2) = 23.23, p < 0.001; positive mutuality: χ 2 (2) = 102.44, p < 0.001).

Results Rating of emotional valence The main effect of the ‘regulation type’ was found to be highly significant ( F (2174) = 157.5, P < 0.001, = 0.357): participants rated their emotions more positively in the distraction (4.82 ± 1.12) and reappraisal blocks (4.86 ± 1.10) when compared to the no-regulation block (3.88 ± 1.16, P < 0.001), whereas the emotion valence between the reappraisal and distraction blocks did not differ ( P = 1.000).

Similarly, DO exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in nearly all seasonal contrasts for each river, with the only non-significant result being for ZH river between dry and wet seasons ( p = 0.316).

An extremely significant difference was observed in the cost of GF white and seeded breads compared to the standard equivalents ( p < 0.001).

By contrast, a 2 × 5 (Sotos/Sibs × SRS subscale) mixed measures ANOVA found a highly significant main effect of group, ( F (1,163) = 474.88, p < .001) as scores for the children with Sotos syndrome were considerably higher than for the unaffected siblings.

In contrast to other studies, we found a decreasing trend in cases in the recent decade (IRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.95, P -value = 0.001); only 66% of culture-confirmed isolates were found to be LP1.

The coefficient of variation‐analysis of variance revealed that the model was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This relation was indicated by highly significant ( p < 0.001) and strong correlations between LBW of does at mating and litter size as total (r = 0.859), live at birth (r = 0.754), and weaning (r = 0.813).

Gestational age demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001) with plasma β-hCG concentrations in the LNSP group, and weak positive correlations in the miscarriage and PUL groups.

japonensis exhibited an extremely significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation with the following gut microbiota taxa: Epulopiscium , U114 , Bacteroides , Clostridium and Peptostreptococcaceae (0.8< r < 0.9); and a significant ( P < 0.05) correlation with Enterobacteriaceae , Micrococcaceae , Rummeliibacillus , Lysinibacillus boronitolerans , Veillonellaceae , Oxalobacteraceae , Aeromonadaceae (negative), Marinibacillus and Chitinilyticum (0.4< r < 0.7).

Highly significant differences existed between any two sample groups ( P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference among these five species ( χ 2 = 546.91, p < 0.001) in their attachment duration, but the effect size, or practical magnitude of this difference was only moderate ( ε 2 = 0.12, CI [0.10‐0.14]) (Figure 2 ) (Rea & Parker 1992 ).

Performing PCR in discrepant cases either by EIAs or CLIAs would improve the sensitivity of the respective two-step algorithm towards TC in a highly significant manner ( p < 0.001; Table 3 ).

The results of two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between the groups with normospermia and pathozoospermia, as well as between the three ethnic groups in terms of semen quality, including the total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology ( Figure 2 ).

Statistical significant ( p < 0.05), highly significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) features are indicated with (∗), (∗∗), and (∗∗∗) respectively.

Intensified salvage therapy for severe GvHD (high-dose corticosteroids (≥1 mg/kg body weight) and basiliximab or etanercept) was a highly significant risk factor for IFD (OR 5.2, p = 0.001) and for invasive aspergillosis (OR 8.7, p < 0.001).