Previously, we had found that for an OR with a typical expression frequency (~0.1%) and an effect size of ~2-fold, statistically 12 OE sections taken from four different animals were sufficient to find a highly significant difference (p < 0.001; two-tailed paired t test).
Excerpts
Statistical analysis showed that the treatment with 20E, PonA, or MakA, as well as starvation, had a very highly significant, negative effect on larval weight evolution (p < 0.001).
The adjusted model was highly significant ( p <0.001) but explained only 3.5% of the variance in the outcome measures.
decussatus samples using SPSS 27 and the data showed highly significant differences between the two species ( p < 0.001).
ANOVA showed highly significant effects ( P < 0.001) of genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions for GY in the seven EYTs ( Supplementary Table 2 ).
F value of 541.656 with 3 and 56 degrees of freedom is found to be highly significant ( P <.001).
Results of PERMANOVAs were also highly significant (tribe, F = 9.497, p < 0.001; genus, F = 9.038, p < 0.001; species, F = 6.112, p < 0.001; social category, F = 11.165, p < 0.001).
The difference between two mean values was analyzed by Student's; t -test and was considered to be statistically significant in case of P < 0.05 and highly significant with P < 0.001.
The experimental group’s breadth gain (M = 13.4 points) was roughly twice that of the control group (M = 6.3 points), and the between-group difference on gain scores was highly significant (t = 4.37, p < .001).
Differences were considered significant (*) for p < 0.05, highly significant (**) for p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) for p < 0.001.
A post hoc statistical analysis showed that the age (as a covariate) of the population included in the study has no effect ( P = 0.749) in the highly significant clinical improvement ( P < 0.001) obtained with MV130 when compared with placebo.
There was a significant trend for lower screening time and lower radiation dose in more recent procedures (Pearson's Correlation Coefficient −0.45, p < 0.001 and −0.29, p = 0.002, respectively). 4.3 Follow-up and arrhythmia recurrence Follow-up data are presented in Table 4 .
A highly significant Spearman's correlation was found between mean SARSCoV-2 E/S genes Ct values and positivization time of manual antigen test (r= 0.70; p<0.001).
Linear correlation is highly significant ( P < 0.001) and is described by the following equations (where IQ = image quality): \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin
Among the aneuploidies showing increased transcriptome size, 1 out of 9 exhibited highly significant increases ( P -value < 0.001).
ECT treatment itself led to a highly significant reduction of 13.3 points in the MADRS ( p <.001).
Analyses of variance revealed a highly significant CS by preceding reminder type interaction ( F (2, 54) = 7.63, p = .001, η p 2 = .22); see Fig 4 .
ANOVA consequently revealed a highly significant main effect of CORT level ( F 1,18 = 40, p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).
The corresponding test for trend was highly significant ( p = 0.001).
Trails B response time produced a highly significant R square change of 0.280 ( F = 29.54, df = 1, 76, p < 0.001) as did WCS perseverative errors with a R square change of 0.081, ( F = 9.55, df = 1, 75, p = 0.003).
There was a significant trend of decreasing family communication with increasing spousal AUD score among female participants (P < 0.001; data not shown).
In this study, a highly significant positive correlation ( R = 0.309, p < 0.001) between the IFC and the CIE a* value was observed, similar to previous reports by Mortimer et al.
Additionally, the c value at ME6.28 showed a decreasing trend compared to other levels of ME ( P < 0.001).
For all of the investigated dependent variables, a highly significant effect was observed for the LMM intercept ( P < 0.001), reflecting model stability.
Significance was reported using standard academic conventions, with stars indicating levels of significance: * p < 0.05 (Significant); ** p < 0.01 (Highly Significant); *** p < 0.001 (Very Highly Significant).