Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp-value <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A longer period of follow-up in our study (i.e., 6 months in our study versus 3 months in the initial validation) in a different setting (i.e., nursing home vs geriatric clinic) made it possible to highlight a highly significant difference in the total TSLUMFA score between the two groups (20 (15.75–22.25) points versus 23 (20–25) points, p-value <0.001).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Significant decreases in tension, agitation, scare, panic, anxiety, and nervousness scores ( P <0.001) and highly significant increases in relaxation, comfort, and tranquility scores ( P <0.001) were found in all women according to the self-reported questionnaires.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The intragroup comparison showed a highly significant difference from baseline to 3 to 6 months in both the groups for the clinical parameters, i.e., GI, PI, CAL, and PPD ( P < 0.001), whereas the intergroup comparison showed no statistical difference.
a significant trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
However, there was a significant trend toward a higher risk of RR with PCI using DES versus CABG (RR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.28–2.33, P < 0.001), with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, P = 0.653) across the trails (Figure 2 and Table 3 ).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference between invisible and visible faces was confirmed by the two-way repeated measured ANOVA analysis with image set and face visibility as factors: there was a highly significant main effect of face visibility: F (1, 9) = 118.425, p < .001 but non-significant main effect of image set [ F (2, 18) = 3, p = .075] and non-significant interaction between image set and face visibility [ F (2, 18) < 1].
a decreasing trendp<0.0010.0× alphagold
Overall, there was a decreasing trend in δ 13 C oto over the last century (main Year effect p<0.001), with a larger decrease observed in Icelandic cod (mean values of δ 13 C oto decreased by 0.7‰ over the past 100 years) compared to NEA cod (mean values decreased by 0.3‰ over the past 100 years) ( Table 2 , Fig 3 ).