Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
euphratica seedlings showed highly significant positive correlations with vascular bundle structure and midrib thickness (r = 0.63~0.91, p < 0.001), while soluble sugar content exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with vascular bundle structure (r = −0.74~−0.80, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The multivariate test revealed that all main effects (species and extraction) and their interaction were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that both factors, independently and in combination, significantly influence the overall phenolic composition ( Table S4 ).
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Group A was defined as the group of patients who had a mild level of fatigue at baseline, with their fatigue level demonstrating an increasing trend during the treatment period but consistently remaining at a mild level ( I = 1.111, P < 0.001; S = 0.439, P < 0.001).
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
* Indicates significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05), ** indicates very significant differences ( p ≤ 0.01), and *** indicates highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) compared with the negative control (lymphocytes without treatment), while § indicates significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) compared with the positive control (sodium arsenite).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The data obtained provide evidence that the average inhibition of H 2 O 2 -initiated ROS accumulation by preincubation with 100 μM and 100 nM α-T for 18 h was 75.9% ± 3.1% and 54.8% ± 7.1%, respectively; the antioxidative effect of micromolar and nanomolar α-T was highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), the effect of 100 μM α-T being more pronounced than the effect of 100 nM α-T under the experimental conditions used ( p < 0.05, n = 4).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results: The Spearman’s correlation coefficient between ARFI (0.795) and MBT (0.678) and the histological diagnosis of NASH was highly significant (p < 0.001).
UEG Week 2015 Poster Presentations
United European Gastroenterol J · 2015 · PMC4669991