Further filtering identified 18 phosphosites mapping to four distinct genes that exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between tumor and non-tumor groups.
Excerpts
The ANOVA for NIHSS scores (Table 5 ) revealed highly significant main effects of Time (MS = 1852, F(3, 48) = 676.9, ηp2 = 0.96, p < 0.001) and Group (MS = 2175, F(1, 50) = 169.2, ηp2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), as well as a significant Time × Group interaction (MS = 424, F(3, 48) = 155.2, ηp2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).
The results of the two-way ANOVA statistical analysis showed that both gene and time had highly significant effects on the variable ( p < 0.001 in both cases).
In the presence of 1 μM PDBu, clear and highly significant ( P < 0.001) inhibitory effects on MT extension were observed at nocodazole doses as low as 10 nM and inhibition of the PDBu response was essentially complete in 100 nM nocodazole.
The information is combined both verbal and non-verbal methods of education information, for instance banners, pamphlets and inquiring to consultation with healthcare provider via LINE group. 17 This approach has also been established by few other studies, 18 – 21 which shows that the literacy is further increased because of the patient has an opportunity to interact with the respective diseases and get educated. 22 This study also showed that diet behavior among T2DM patients played a highly significant role in blood sugar levels control with increased odds ratio in the model of multivariate analysis (AOR=9.71; 95%CI=5.98-15.77; p-value<0.001).
The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant and p < 0.001 most highly significant.
When comparing self-reported physical activity data to 1-minute bout accelerometer-assessed physical activity data (AT1; Table 5 ), the Wilcoxon paired t-test showed highly significant differences for LPA ( p < .001) and MET minutes per week ( p = .02).
Differences between urban and rural farms were highly significant (P<0.001) but negligible in magnitude (difference in overall means: <1 degree F).
An inverse and highly significant correlation was found between serum potassium and D-dimer (r = −0.21; p < 0.001), even after adjustments for age and sex (beta coefficient −94.8; p = 0.001).
The difference in the correlation coefficients was highly significant ( p < 0.001): the statistical significance was confirmed and validated with Fisher’s z transformation test ( p < 0.001). 4.
Group differences in neurocognitive function The MANOVA on group differences in neurocognitive function was highly significant for Group (F(16,176) = 3.78, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.256).
A statistically highly significant difference was found between the dry-matter content of leaf extract and seed extract ( p < 0.001).
However, the main effect of image category was highly significant ( F [1, 76] = 158.38, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.67), and the interaction of age group and image category was also significant ( F [3, 76] = 3.19, p = 0.028, η 2 = 0.11).
The differences in seropositive rates were statistically non-significant with clade S/wild type (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test; p = 0.3170), but highly significant with the Delta variant (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test; p = 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
The difference in APTT prolongation between the Plasmodium-infected and healthy control was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001).
The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant and p < 0.001 most highly significant.
Correlation analyses are presented in Table 3 . According to this analysis, there is a negative and highly significant relationship between GSDMD and TAS (r=-0.748, P =0.001).
A full factorial ANCOVA of the residuals revealed a highly significant three-way interaction term between predator group, square of relative initial prey density and the predator-prey body mass ratio (F 7,344 = 26.41, p<0.001, r 2 = 0.35).
This two-way interaction between intersection configuration and scan direction was highly significant ( F (2,225) = 104.14, P < 0.001).
For Bio-PC1, 43 SNPs were identified ( p < 0.01), of which 11 were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and three remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing ( q < 0.05) ( Fig 4A , S3 Table ).
A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test (testing whether pre-exercise scores exceeded post-exercise scores) was highly significant (W = 10 585, P < 0.001; Table 2 ).
Results Prevalence of leg cramps between group I (LSCS) and group II (control) was highly significant (i.e., p -value <0.001), when matched for occurrence with respect to the frequency (daily/weekly/monthly/yearly).
Thus, the data indicate a strong and highly significant (P < 0.001) potentiation between mCAP1 and Sgk1 for the I Na effect, whereas the synergism for the N effect was small (though significant) and less than additive.
When comparing positions independently, the greatest group differences occurred in conditions P1 (eyes open and firm surface) and P3 (eyes closed and firm surface), both showing highly significant differences (p < 0.001) favoring the control group, with large effect sizes (d > 1.88) ( Figure 3 ).
Particularly, correlation for Pb in blood and teeth reprocessed by the log-linear regression model and after exclusions of outliers was highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001), as shown in Fig. 1 .