Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant interaction ( F 15,115 = 4.279, p < 0.001) between pesticide concentration and duration of exposure, where crayfish exposed to higher concentrations of imidacloprid began to show a greater frequency of the neutral response after shorter exposure durations compared to those exposed to lower concentrations (Fig. 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to sham mice, the levels of serum creatinine were significantly increased at all three time points in IR-injured WT and KO mice and the differences in the means of serum creatinine were highly significant among all different groups of WT mice ( p < 0.001), KO mice ( p < 0.001), or all groups from both WT and KO ( p < 0.001), as indicated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
67 In the Copenhagen Male Study, for example, which was an 8-year follow-up of 2906 men free of CAD, an increasing trend ( P < 0.001) between triglyceride concentration and CAD events was shown to be independent of other risk factors including HDL cholesterol concentrations. 68 Other data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC), which was a 10-year follow-up of 12,339 middle-aged North American subj
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
marginally significantP = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The analysis showed a marginally significant group effect (Wald χ 2 = 3.820, P = 0.051), a highly significant time effect (Wald χ 2 = 760.909, P < 0.001), and no significant group-by-time interaction (Wald χ 2 = 2.325, P = 0.676).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results The in Vivo Effects of Colchicine Combined with Either Acetazolamide or Atorvastatin Against Adults and Muscle Larvae Table ( 1 a) displays a highly significant difference between the examined groups in terms of T. spiralis adult count in the small intestine (F = 170, P < 0.001).
a significant trendP <.0010.0× alphagold
Considering the Subjective Items scale singularly (which did not show a significant trend), the items “Would you recommend” (median 4.00; SD 0.62; P <.001; effect size=1.00) and “Overall rating” (median 4.00; SD 0.52; P <.001; effect size=1.00) received a strong positive response.
extremely significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
The results of the paired t -test for the recognition accuracy showed that, with single extraction, SepCNN had an extremely significant improvement compared with all classical algorithms [LDA: 76.34% ( p < 0.001, t = 4.72), SVM: 68.58% ( p < 0.001, t = 7.91), BLDA: 53.23% ( p < 0.001, t = 14.55), SWLDA: 50.62% ( p < 0.001, t = 18.44)].