Statistical analysis confirmed this anticipated size difference between sexes to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The analysis generated four discriminant functions which revealed a highly significant difference between call types (Wilks' λ DF1/4 = 0.002, χ 2 = 2446.73, p<0.001; Wilks' λ DF2/4 = 0.088, χ 2 = 934.53, p<0.001; Wilks' DFλ 3/4 = 0.519, χ 2 = 252.48, p<0.001; Wilks' λ DF4 = 0.985, χ 2 = 5.93, p<0.05).
showed a trendP < 0.001
In addition, BCVA (LogMAR) showed a trend of time-dependent decrease from postoperative 1 day to 3 months ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).
Analysis of Variance and Mean Comparison for Physiological Parameters, Biomass, and Root System Architecture Traits An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of the genotype-water regime interaction for only stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), and intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEi) ( Table 2 ).
Our rate of 33.3% was highly significant as well as the 22.7% (χ 2 = 10.80, P < 0.001) of Slijepcevic and cols.
Significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) statistical differences were observed between the GD and OMFS practitioner groups’ antibiotic prophylactic frequencies for medically compromised patients.
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, paired t test) and the data indicate that the model could be established successfully.
Clinical stage IV was found to be consistently very highly significant ( P > 0.001) in comparison with other stages [ Table 3 ].
A 3×2 ANCOVA controlling for age, found a highly significant difference between patient groups [ F (2, 268) = 7.14, P = 0.001; see Table 2 ].
The linear regression between water and logger temperature (20 points) was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.99, p = 0.001).
The activity-dependent changes were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all three physiological properties by testing if the slopes of linear regressions of individual cell responses differed from 0 ( Figures 2C–E ).
The mean postoperative refractive SE when implanting a plus power IOLs was −0.3 ± 0.51 D ( P < 0.001) while the mean postoperative refractive SE when implanting a minus power IOLs was +1.21 ± 0.11 D denoting a highly significant tendency toward hyperopia ( P < 0.001).
All the three preloading fluids, including Ringer’s Lactate used as control, were seen to significantly increase the capillary blood glucose levels intra-operatively ( P < 0.05), but the rise with Dextran-40 was seen to be sustained and highly significant ( P < 0.001).
We do not agree that the voltage‐dependence is to shallow to calculate and the quantification that we have provided clearly showed a highly significant (p<0.001) voltage‐dependent block by bupivacaine, with a 2.5‐fold more pronounced inhibition at +70 mV compared to ‐70 mV, as analyzed in Figure 1D.
Interestingly, the addition of 9 μg/mL CsA resulted in a complete and highly significant rescue effect (120%; p < 0.001 with respect to hypoxic treatment).
The root rot phenotype had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation with leaf wilting ( r = 0.826) and plant mortality ( r = 0.982).
The KMO test of sampling adequacy was 0.957, and the Bartlett's test for sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The decrease in intrafollicular 17beta-estradiol concentration after the LH surge was highly significant (p < 0.001).
2 ) and found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) in TMZ treated cells, compared to CTL cells.
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) shows a highly significant effect of pCO 2 on the rate of calcification at the control ( F 4, 40 = 13.105, p<0.001) and elevated temperature ( F 4, 40 = 6.538, p<0.001).
Similarly, lamb birth weight was highly significant for perinatal mortality in the univariable analyses ( p < 0.001), and the current mode of delivery also showed significance (0.018), with lower odds of survival for lighter lambs and lambs born through vaginal delivery.
As shown in Table 2 , the analysis revealed highly significant reductions in: Systolic blood pressure (t (149) = 28.14, p < 0.001) Diastolic blood pressure (t (149) = 27.61, p < 0.001) Pulse rate (t (149) = 21.70, p < 0.001) In addition, there was a statistically significant improvement in: SPO 2 (oxygen saturation) ( t (149) = –2.27, p = 0.023) These results strongly support the hypothesis that music therapy leads to significant improvements in physiological markers of anxiety following exposure to stress. 6.
Specifically, the estimated values of the intercept (b1) and the quadratic term of UOT (b3) were − 0.28 and − 0.00, respectively, both showing highly significant effects ( p < 0.001; Table 1 ).
schimperi R., leaf size had a highly significant impact on the response ( F = 58.91 , p = 0.001 ), whereas extraction time had no significant effect ( p = 0.067 ).
Statistical difference was considered to be significant at a value of P < 0.05 (*), highly significant at a value of P < 0.01 (**) and extremely significant when P < 0.001 (***) or P < 0.0001 (****).